Heir hunters is so mind numbing. It not very clear and keeps repeating itself even within seconds.
I've noticed the general repetition - including of those talking on camera, such as the two 'takes' of one of the main researchers saying pretty much the exact same points on how difficult it was to work with two common surnames, both within hardly two minutes of each other...
Heir hunters is so mind numbing. It not very clear and keeps repeating itself even within seconds.
I've noticed the general repetition - including of those talking on camera, such as the two 'takes' of one of the main researchers saying pretty much the exact same points on how difficult it was to work with two common surnames, both within hardly two minutes of each other...
The show could really be 30mins without all the padding. Man talking about Liverpool being the captain of Ireland was said twice in 30 secs. How is this even classed as decent telly?
It's like Emmon homles this morning talking to braintree council, he was clearly not interested asked pointless questions.... then went on to asked a question straight after being given an answer to said question.
Bloody joke, and people think itv bad no where close....
Heir hunters is so mind numbing. It not very clear and keeps repeating itself even within seconds.
I've noticed the general repetition - including of those talking on camera, such as the two 'takes' of one of the main researchers saying pretty much the exact same points on how difficult it was to work with two common surnames, both within hardly two minutes of each other...
The show could really be 30mins without all the padding. Man talking about Liverpool being the captain of Ireland was said twice in 30 secs. How is this even classed as decent telly?
Taking a guess the programme has been designed for showing (redistributing) on a commercial channel, where between the repeating would be an ad break. Still doesn't really excuse them from assuming that the viewer is so thick they won't remember, even after an ad break.
Heir hunters is so mind numbing. It not very clear and keeps repeating itself even within seconds.
I've noticed the general repetition - including of those talking on camera, such as the two 'takes' of one of the main researchers saying pretty much the exact same points on how difficult it was to work with two common surnames, both within hardly two minutes of each other...
The show could really be 30mins without all the padding. Man talking about Liverpool being the captain of Ireland was said twice in 30 secs. How is this even classed as decent telly?
Taking a guess the programme has been designed for showing (redistributing) on a commercial channel, where between the repeating would be an ad break. Still doesn't really excuse them from assuming that the viewer is so thick they won't remember, even after an ad break.
Even a 5 or 80 year old would turn there noise up this guff, the repeats of pointless stuff is questionable. You may will be right it was its eye on a commercial networks. But the programme really does talk down to you, When asking for viewers help there had some Scottish case.
Do you know from Glasgow, Scotland. Eh? you told us twice it scotland already we are dealing with. I wonder if the V/O would say London, England or Cardiff Wales???
