ST
If someone is spending up to £1,000 on a Freesat HD TV (your estimate), then installing "yet another cable" isn't going to be an insurmountable cost. If they buy a Freeview HD TV next year, then it's going to be connected to an aerial via a cable, albeit to a socket rather than an existing hole in the wall. That's assuming their aerial is suitable for Freeview reception.
I do wonder why your partner's parents don't just upgrade from Sky+ to Sky+HD. No extra cables required, but they would be paying out an extra £10 a month in their subs.
I take your point that some may be disappointed that they can't receive the Freeview HD broadcasts, but they haven't got anything less than the services they were expecting when they bought it. News of Freeview HD has only recently become a popular topic of converstaion amongst anyone other than us anoraks!
My sister is in this situation with a Freeview receiver built into her HD TV, and was rather put out when I explained that she couldn't pick up Freeview HD. She currently uses a Freeview+ box to record programmes, so is used to switching between the internal receiver and the separate box. When the price of FreeviewHD+ boxes come down to a reasonable level she will simply replace it.
I guess its down to personal preference re: Freesat / Freeview HD. I'd prefer them not to have to pay to have another wire installed into the house. As a Sky HD customer it's probably snobbery more than anything towards Freesat.
If someone is spending up to £1,000 on a Freesat HD TV (your estimate), then installing "yet another cable" isn't going to be an insurmountable cost. If they buy a Freeview HD TV next year, then it's going to be connected to an aerial via a cable, albeit to a socket rather than an existing hole in the wall. That's assuming their aerial is suitable for Freeview reception.
I do wonder why your partner's parents don't just upgrade from Sky+ to Sky+HD. No extra cables required, but they would be paying out an extra £10 a month in their subs.
People - particularly elderly people - find the whole thing very difficult to get their heads around (as do some younger people too!).
Certainly it would seem logical to the majority of people that when you buy a brand new HDTV with built-in Freeview, that when Freeview HD launches it should just work, when that is not the case!
People buying a state-of-the-art HDTV with built-in Freeview today will have an out of date product next month. I know technology moves on, but you have to admit it is a bit naughty that the fact that Freeview HD isn't even pointed out as 'coming soon' anywhere in a retail shop.
Certainly it would seem logical to the majority of people that when you buy a brand new HDTV with built-in Freeview, that when Freeview HD launches it should just work, when that is not the case!
People buying a state-of-the-art HDTV with built-in Freeview today will have an out of date product next month. I know technology moves on, but you have to admit it is a bit naughty that the fact that Freeview HD isn't even pointed out as 'coming soon' anywhere in a retail shop.
I take your point that some may be disappointed that they can't receive the Freeview HD broadcasts, but they haven't got anything less than the services they were expecting when they bought it. News of Freeview HD has only recently become a popular topic of converstaion amongst anyone other than us anoraks!
My sister is in this situation with a Freeview receiver built into her HD TV, and was rather put out when I explained that she couldn't pick up Freeview HD. She currently uses a Freeview+ box to record programmes, so is used to switching between the internal receiver and the separate box. When the price of FreeviewHD+ boxes come down to a reasonable level she will simply replace it.