The majority of the criticism on Twitter seems to be coming from people who expected it to be a faithful, serious revival of the show. Quite why they expected that with Harry Hill hosting is beyond me.
So it's the viewers' fault its got such a negative reaction? That's a novel way of putting it.
No, but it may be the viewer's fault for expecting something different to what was advertised. A proportion of the negative criticism has come from people who don't like Harry Hill in the first place, so there's a good chance they actually knew the sort of show they would get beforehand. Perhaps the less than serious tone could have been made even more obvious in the promos (as if straddling a flying yellow star wasn't enough).
Whatever they should have been expecting, it's clear from the reaction so far that they WANTED a faithful revival of what was a much loved and popular talent show. A show that's still fairly recent too.
This has all come at a time when The X Factor is dying because people are fed up of it, and are longing for the days when talent shows were less contrived and more simple, just like Stars In Their Eyes.
Perhaps due to this poor timing, I think Stars is too 'untouchable' for this sort of pastiche. If Harry wanted to work his 'magic' on an old format, there are PLENTY that would have been ripe for a p*sstake. I'm thinking the likes of 321, The Golden Shot, Sale of the Century... Shows that have been ribbed for generations on nostalgia programmes.
In addition to this, while I have enjoyed Harry Hill's previous shows, even taking the programme as a piece of surrealism, it's not that funny and relies too much on recycled material.
Stars in Their Eyes wasn't exactly held reverentially by everyone; it's been "ribbed for generations" too.
The only places I've read about a supposed furore are The Mirror and Metro, which aren't exactly paragons of outstanding journalism. They've both skimmed some Twitter comments and put it into an article form; The Mirror has scoured Facebook for a "campaign" (of 850 likes) to get Matthew Kelly back.
Ultimately, it's not going to spell doom for Harry Hill and I severely doubt it'll get pulled, unless ITV were really expecting the show to beat The Voice.
Personally, I don't think the show was perfect, but was enjoyable. But I'm not looking for an X Factor replacement, nor have I lost the numbers 4 and 6 off my Freeview remote that would allow me access to old episodes of Stars in Their Eyes.