AS
Could it have originally been in the Websites forum? Yes. Could it have been later moved? Yes. Does it really matter that much it needed this kind of response from you? No.
It's interesting how two members RTP'd within minutes of each other, five days after the topic was created! Why the sudden fuss?
And David, maybe you'd like to explain the reference to Rob, I don't understand - send me a PM.
Asa
Admin
It's gone beyond a joke now.
Could it have originally been in the Websites forum? Yes. Could it have been later moved? Yes. Does it really matter that much it needed this kind of response from you? No.
It's interesting how two members RTP'd within minutes of each other, five days after the topic was created! Why the sudden fuss?
And David, maybe you'd like to explain the reference to Rob, I don't understand - send me a PM.
BA
Could it have originally been in the Websites forum? Yes. Could it have been later moved? Yes. Does it really matter that much it needed this kind of response from you? No.
It's interesting how two members RTP'd within minutes of each other, five days after the topic was created! Why the sudden fuss?
And David, maybe you'd like to explain the reference to Rob, I don't understand - send me a PM.
I did it simply because people were complaining about it, but had seemingly not had the idea to report it as in the wrong forum. I would have done it earlier had I not presumed this thread would be closed soon due to the controversial subject matter.
It's gone beyond a joke now.
Could it have originally been in the Websites forum? Yes. Could it have been later moved? Yes. Does it really matter that much it needed this kind of response from you? No.
It's interesting how two members RTP'd within minutes of each other, five days after the topic was created! Why the sudden fuss?
And David, maybe you'd like to explain the reference to Rob, I don't understand - send me a PM.
I did it simply because people were complaining about it, but had seemingly not had the idea to report it as in the wrong forum. I would have done it earlier had I not presumed this thread would be closed soon due to the controversial subject matter.
RO
rob
Founding member
So, Chris Williams steals one of my videos to make this monstrosity.
Sent him a message telling him to stop stealing my videos. He responds by not only posting this which is a rip-off of this, but also blocking me from commenting on his videos.
The guy's a moron.
Sent him a message telling him to stop stealing my videos. He responds by not only posting this which is a rip-off of this, but also blocking me from commenting on his videos.
The guy's a moron.
JO
He's no more than an avoidable annoyance at this point (the many reasons for his behaviour discussed ad nauseam).
A search for "cwilliams1976" returns more results pointing out the factual inaccuracies and general ridiculousness of his videos than content from the user himself.
There's nothing more that can be said/done and tbh nothing more that needs to be said/done.
A search for "cwilliams1976" returns more results pointing out the factual inaccuracies and general ridiculousness of his videos than content from the user himself.
There's nothing more that can be said/done and tbh nothing more that needs to be said/done.
DA
Joined Jun 14, 2008
This is not a new account, this is his old account with [most of] his videos restored.
1883 videos already... Hmm, I guess that's typcally cwilliams. How could he upload so many videos in a really short period of time?
Joined Jun 14, 2008
This is not a new account, this is his old account with [most of] his videos restored.
BA
The main problem with his channel is that his content is "stolen" from people who have uploaded the original files, breaching copyright laws. In theory, his legal position is better as he could claim his videos are parodies and therefore legal under US copyright law.
PT
DOG your videos. I have since 2008. It doesn't stop him but at least it shows who uploaded it originally.
RO
Unfortunately, according to Chris through an e-mail he sent me this evening (how he got my personal e-mail address I don't know):
I'm just going to ignore everything he says and does now. I know what I'm doing is right, and I won't be swayed otherwise.
rob
Founding member
DOG your videos. I have since 2008. It doesn't stop him but at least it shows who uploaded it originally.
Unfortunately, according to Chris through an e-mail he sent me this evening (how he got my personal e-mail address I don't know):
Quote:
I think this idea of a watermark is absolutely childish.
I'm just going to ignore everything he says and does now. I know what I'm doing is right, and I won't be swayed otherwise.
Last edited by rob on 16 May 2013 11:14pm
DA
Didn't the original uploader do that already? Strictly speaking...
The main problem with his channel is that his content is "stolen" from people who have uploaded the original files, breaching copyright laws.
Didn't the original uploader do that already? Strictly speaking...