WH
I didn't say that. I said we on TVForum think differently about presentation, etc. I said how we think about these changes is entirely different kettle of fish to they way the general public think about them.
You're saying that by being a TVForum member, I'm not part of the general viewing public, so to me that suggests my opinion is less important.
For the love of God! Where have I said that you - and other members of TVForum - are not a member of the viewing public? Nowhere. I'm a member of TVForum too yet I consider myself a member of the viewing public.
Secondly, where have I said that your opinion, as a member of TVForum, matters less? I haven't. I have said that we, as members of a forum that discusses television presentation, view matters differently to members of the general public.
Firstly calm down.
You ask where you have said I'm not a member of the general public. Well, look right below that question, as you once again say that TV Forum members view matters differently to the general public. That is implying people like us are in some way different to the general public.
By saying our opinions are 'a different kettle of fish' to the general public, implies that it would *only* be TVF members (or people with similar interests) would appreciate the presentation of the programme. That is somewhat devaluing our opinion by implying we are in a minority, when I actually think the majority are affected by presentation.
Whataday
Founding member
Also I find it insulting to say what 'people like us' think about a particular programme is less important than what anyone else thinks.
I didn't say that. I said we on TVForum think differently about presentation, etc. I said how we think about these changes is entirely different kettle of fish to they way the general public think about them.
You're saying that by being a TVForum member, I'm not part of the general viewing public, so to me that suggests my opinion is less important.
For the love of God! Where have I said that you - and other members of TVForum - are not a member of the viewing public? Nowhere. I'm a member of TVForum too yet I consider myself a member of the viewing public.
Secondly, where have I said that your opinion, as a member of TVForum, matters less? I haven't. I have said that we, as members of a forum that discusses television presentation, view matters differently to members of the general public.
Firstly calm down.
You ask where you have said I'm not a member of the general public. Well, look right below that question, as you once again say that TV Forum members view matters differently to the general public. That is implying people like us are in some way different to the general public.
By saying our opinions are 'a different kettle of fish' to the general public, implies that it would *only* be TVF members (or people with similar interests) would appreciate the presentation of the programme. That is somewhat devaluing our opinion by implying we are in a minority, when I actually think the majority are affected by presentation.
