Indeed, I'm sure that the concept of the breakfast service being a distinct "station" in its own right is/was utterly lost on most viewers.
The whole "see you tomorrow 6am-9.25am" sort of business, followed by the "Good morning and welcome" type business from your regional franchisee clearly attempted to emphasise the distinction to "Average Viewers". But I highly doubt that many/most/all of them actually stopped to think about what any if that "handover" business meant. Or even consciously registered it as having any significance. Or, even if any *did* wonder what all that malarkey at 9.25 was in aid of, I doubt that they would get to the correct answer.
Given how heavily "ITV"-branded the current incarnation of the breakfast service is, in most parts of the UK the franchise divide is the most invisible it has ever been.
Conversely, it might seem more jarring than ever in STV land at least (arguably not quite so much in UTV land anymore, as ITV & UTV look so similar now). When trailers/breakbumpers etc are most explicitly
not
"ITV" for most of the day, normal viewers (who don't know/care about the franchising structure) might possibly find it a tad odd - but nevertheless not actually care - that it is "allowed" to be "ITV" during breakfast time only.
That said, STV/UTV have long-since had a certain amount of ITV-creep through things like the national news, in-programme mentions etc. All of which will have sufficiently normalised the "it's sort-of called STV, but it's also sort-of called ITV" situation (even if they don't understand why). Arguably, that has long-since been normalised in
all
regions - via everything from the TV Times column headings to the 1989 generic logo (and beyond).
Last edited by Lou Scannon on 21 April 2018 5:38pm