JA
I kind of disagree. I think the word we're all looking for is "discussion" - Kate and said gentleman had a discussion about the previous day's events, during which the two transferred opinions. Kate was careful to back her arguments up with viewers' emails and texts (although the mound of paper on the desk can't have been very good for GMTV's green credibility) and it may not have been a very good interview, but was certainly a good discussion.
BBC WORLD posted:
Exactly, Rob. Well said. But back to the Garraway interview, where everyone was saying how good it was, and bemoaned my comparison of the same against the likes of Doucet and Wark. It appears what people actually meant was that it was a "good interview within the context of GMTV's usual style", and not necessarily a "good interview" per se?
I still stand by my specific comments of Kate falling into the trap of the interviewee turning the tables and asking her a question, which she went on to try and answer, and even insisted on being allowed to give her answer.
Other early morning breakfast presenters on other channels (which someone above remarked that breakfast television is not serious and hard hitting and people don't want heavy news in the mornings) such as Sian Williams / Kate Silverton / Lorna Dunkley / Susanna Reid / even GMTV's own Emma Crosby would not have handled the discussion in this manner by entertaining the questions of the interviewee.
I still stand by my specific comments of Kate falling into the trap of the interviewee turning the tables and asking her a question, which she went on to try and answer, and even insisted on being allowed to give her answer.
Other early morning breakfast presenters on other channels (which someone above remarked that breakfast television is not serious and hard hitting and people don't want heavy news in the mornings) such as Sian Williams / Kate Silverton / Lorna Dunkley / Susanna Reid / even GMTV's own Emma Crosby would not have handled the discussion in this manner by entertaining the questions of the interviewee.
I kind of disagree. I think the word we're all looking for is "discussion" - Kate and said gentleman had a discussion about the previous day's events, during which the two transferred opinions. Kate was careful to back her arguments up with viewers' emails and texts (although the mound of paper on the desk can't have been very good for GMTV's green credibility) and it may not have been a very good interview, but was certainly a good discussion.