TV
Great news for frog-haters: the Advertising Standards Authority has upheld complaints about the Crazy Frog ads, slapping a 9pm restriction on any further showings. Legal moves by Jamster to contest the curfew failed.
The ASA agreed the ads didn't make clear that a subscription service was being advertised, and not a one-off ringtone. The Frog's appeal to children was highlighted by the fact 33 youngsters incurred large phone bills after downloading the tone.
While the frequency of the ads was out of the ASA's remit, they agreed the campaign "raised concerns about the influence of advertising on children." The decision: ads for several Jamster characters were ruled in breach of the advertising code.
Full adjudication here. A victory for common sense!
The ASA agreed the ads didn't make clear that a subscription service was being advertised, and not a one-off ringtone. The Frog's appeal to children was highlighted by the fact 33 youngsters incurred large phone bills after downloading the tone.
While the frequency of the ads was out of the ASA's remit, they agreed the campaign "raised concerns about the influence of advertising on children." The decision: ads for several Jamster characters were ruled in breach of the advertising code.
Full adjudication here. A victory for common sense!