TV Home Forum

"Freeview Tipped To Overtake Sky By 2007"- MG

(March 2004)

This site closed in March 2021 and is now a read-only archive
DC
Des Cartes
Source

Quote:
Freeview could outstrip Sky by 2007

Patrick Barrett
Wednesday March 24, 2004


Freeview: currently available in half of all TV homes

Freeview, the digital TV service backed by the BBC, is set to replace Sky as the UK's favourite way of watching multichannel television by the end of 2007.
According to industry research, the free-to-air service, which is available in 3 million homes compared with Sky's 7.2 million, is expected to be adopted by almost 10 million households in four years time, with Sky in 8.9 million UK homes and cable in just 3.5 million.

The study also suggest 87% of households will have gone digital by 2008, leaving only a small minority of die-hard analogue viewers.

The figures will set off warning bells at BSkyB, where recently appointed James Murdoch axed plans to launch a general entertainment channel on Freeview to rival ITV1 and Channel 4 earlier this month.

The predictions, made by ZenithOptimedia in its UK Television Forecast 2007, also conflict with Sky's own subscriber growth estimates. The satellite broadcaster has set itself the task of reaching 8 million homes by the end of 2005, but sees significant potential for additional growth as the country switches over from analogue to digital.

At the company's last results briefing, James Murdoch said he believed there were still 10 million customers for BSkyB to target over the next six to 10 years.

Zenith suggests Sky may see growth in its subscriber base slow significantly, while Freeserve surges ahead.

Adam Smith, the head of knowledge management at ZenithOptimedia, said the dramatic growth of Freeview was likely because the service would become as standard as Teletext.

"There is no subscription barrier and the hardware cost will continue to tumble. We expect Freeview to be hardwired into TVs.

"Sky believe they have the potential to reach 10 million homes in the UK and I don't doubt they'll get there, but not in this time scale," he said.

Smith added that cable would continue to struggle, despite the prospect of a merger between Telewest and NTL.

"There is no compelling case for digital cable. A merger would cut the cost base, but it won't help the marketing of cable. I don't think people care who owns it."

The study largely validates the government's plan to switch off analogue TV signals by 2010. By the end of 2007, Zenith expects 22.3 million out of a total of 25.6 million homes to be watching digital TV.

Freeview has enjoyed a dramatic rate of uptake in recent months. In the last quarter of 2003 the number of Freeview boxes sold rose by 41%, helping to take digital penetration in the UK to over half of all households, according to Ofcom.

Zenith says rapid uptake of Freeview will continue this year. It expects that by the end of 2004 15.2 million households will watch TV via some sort of digital service. It expects Freeview to account for 4.8 million and Sky 7.6 million, while the number of cable homes will have fallen from 3 million at the end of 2003 to 2.8 million.

The dramatic increase in access to multichannel TV will also have a significant affect on audience shares and advertising revenues for terrestrial broadcasters.

ITV1's share of audiences is set to fall to 19.4% in 2007 from 21.8% last year, according to Zenith, while its share of revenue will drop below 50% for the first time this year - and will fall to 46.5% in 2007.

Zenith expects Channel 4 to largely hold its own with 9.5% of viewing compared to 9.6% in 2003 and its share of ad revenue down marginally to 19.5%.

Meanwhile, Channel Five could be the only real terrestrial winner, with Zenith expecting the station to account for 6.8% of all viewing in 2007 compared to 6.4% last year.


So the 2010 analogue switch off date is looking increasingly likely. Not a fantastic outlook for Sky, however I have every confidence in the Murdochs pulling out all the stops in an attempt to lure hesitant would-be digital subscribers. Interesting also to see how ITV will resist the squeeze as the market becomes more and more fragmented, will we see further cost-cutting and consolidation?
:-(
A former member
That is what needs to happen though. I don't think it's doom and gloom for Sky.

Freeview has to become the equivalent of analogue terrestrial whxih means most of the country have to have it.

There will always be more people who won't pay for digital TV than those who will.
CW
cwathen Founding member
That report is a combination of stating the obvious and rubbish. They are using 'Freeview' as a way of saying ' DTT'. Of course DTT will continue to grow and of course in time it will be more popular than Sky - if it's going to be the 'normal telly' of the future obviously it will overtake it.

Saying that 'Freeview is going to be more popular than Sky by 2007' is inaccurate as people aren't going to explicitly choose Freeview, they're going to get DTT as their 'normal telly' and end up with Freeview by default. And additionally, that figure assumes that people have actually chosen Freeview/DTT *over* Sky, when in reality an awful lot of people have got it to *complement* Sky by adding a few more channels to bedroom/kitchen TV's - in the living room Sky still reigns supreme.

I strongly dispute the 2007 date, and I refuse to believe that analogue terrestrial will end by 2010. As I've said many times, I've yet to see a single piece of research on digital penetration which shows true values for it's growth. All these reports count people as having 'gone digital' if they have a single device wth a digital tuner in it - in many cases a Sky box attached to their living room TV. But this is not the 1970's. Almost everyone has at least a TV and Video, and the vast majority of people have at least one additional TV in the kitchen or bedroom. And a sizeable number of people have additional TV's in the kitchen and in multiple bedrooms, and videos in the bedrooms too - a not insignificant number of people have 4 or 5 TV's in use and 2 or 3 videos. And I see that figure rising as the price of low end portable TVs and VCRs continues to plummet (VCRs now fly off the shelves of Tesco for barely more than £40 - unthinkable even as little as 5 years ago) - but this is all *analogue* kit.

With that being the situation, a home which has truly 'gone digital' would need to have digital tuners of some type connected to every piece of equipment they have and have no depencies on analogue terrestrial at all. But this is just not happening, a lot of people might have some form of digital TV, a lot of people might have DTT on a second TV, but very few people have equipped all their TVs AND VCRs with digital tuners (and an even fewer number of people have actually bought equipment that has a digital tuner in the first place). True digital penetration I'd estimate to be at no more than the 5-10% mark.

And indeed in real terms I'd actually go so far as to say that people are becoming *more* dependent on analogue transmission, not less. Before anyone disputes that, for every Sky box or 'Freeview box' people buy, Tescos will sell five 14" analogue portable TVs. If anyone conducted a survey to find out just how many cheap tellys and videos are bought, I'd stake my life on the results demonstrating that investment in analogue equipment is actually undergoing a massive growth phase, not a decline, and indeed is growing faster and new penetration is increasing many times that of digital.

Of course neither the government nor the industry would ever dare to comission such a report, because it would interfere with their analogue switch off targets.

But nevertheless, they know this is happening, and they know it's completely laughable to suggest that analogue terrestrial will end by 2010 - I'd say it's got at least another 10-15 years to go, and I don't think it's entirely inconceivable that it'll still be in use even 20 years into the future.

And for my part, as long as the industry refuses to make an IDTV with a 4:3 screen, I won't stop buying analogue TVs either.
:-(
A former member
Ever since having my first analogue Sky box at my parents house back in 1990 I piped the signal round the house to *ALL* the TVs (Kitchen, and 2 x bedrooms in addition to the lounge). I have the same setup in my house on Sky Digital now.

Since Sky Digital launched and my parents had it installed, I simply went back and "fed" the output from the digital box round the house. My parents now watch and record digital signals from the Sky Digital box in every room in the house. So yes - there is one digital *device* in the house, but this provides signals to every TV and VCR in the property.

The "Sky Magic Eye" connection does much the same on a smaller, less complicated scale. A high proportion of the households you refer to may have only 2 televisions (lounge and bedroom/kitchen). Allthough they do not own 2 seperate digital devices, both of their TVs may well be "fed" from the Sky Digital box.....and therefore I would consider their inclusion in the "Digital Households" figures to be valid.
CW
cwathen Founding member
Quote:
The "Sky Magic Eye" connection does much the same on a smaller, less complicated scale. A high proportion of the households you refer to may have only 2 televisions (lounge and bedroom/kitchen). Allthough they do not own 2 seperate digital devices, both of their TVs may well be "fed" from the Sky Digital box.....and therefore I would consider their inclusion in the "Digital Households" figures to be valid.

We have a system like that in our house too, using both the RF outputs from the Sky box (even though the average installer will use the RF loopthrough there is absolutely no point in running the aerial through a satellite receiver if you're connecting everything with scart leads) to feed two more TVs.

But I wouldn't include them in the 'digital households' figure since if analogue were turned off it would turn all the additional TVs into video monitors for the main TV and all the VCRs would effectively become tunerless devices that can only record whatever is being watched. With very few exceptions, even people who to distribute the signal from the digital box elsewhere to other TVs in their house are still dependent on analogue terrestrial.
:-(
A former member
To be honest I can't see DTT becoming "normal TV" until all TV sets are manufactured with a digital receiver built in - and when that happens, people won't be "choosing Freeview over Sky" as that report tries to make out.

As has been said earlier, a lot of people with Sky buy a Freeview box for a 2nd or 3rd TV in the house - epecially if your analogue reception ain't that great.
CW
cwathen Founding member
Quote:
To be honest I can't see DTT becoming "normal TV" until all TV sets are manufactured with a digital receiver built in - and when that happens, people won't be "choosing Freeview over Sky" as that report tries to make out.

Indeed. And that's not happening for a long time - it would be a suicidal move for any manufacturer (except possibly some specialist/very high end ones) to do that now since their budget market (i.e. equipment with a sub-£100 price tag) would dissapear overnight, and at present with more and more people rushing to equipment more rooms in their house with a TV, that is surely where they are making a sizeable proportion of their money atm.

Away from TVs, the VCR market isn't sustainable at present without analogue equipment there, consumer level VCRs only became available from the start of this year, and account for less than 1% (or in some cases, 0%) of a shop's VCR range. And again, the low end market is entirely comprised of analogue VCRs, with that not looking to change any time soon.

But at least DTT TVs and VCRs are available; some equipment (notably pocket TVs) have no digital replacement on the market yet, and no sign of anything appearing for a good for years (from an engineering point of view, a useable pocket DTT TV would surely be quite a challenge).

The day when analogue equipment will be cut off at source is a long way away, short of government intervention to make the manufacture of analogue equiment illegal (and I don't think even they would propose to do anything quite as ridiculous as that).

The government's target dates are not really targets at all, they're basically just creative bits of marketing to try and shy people away from buying analogue equipment which the government is saying will be obsolete in a few years' time. But when they've allready shown themselves to be doing this once (according to their original target, analogue TV would end in 2005 - only a year from now) by setting a target and then pushing it back by a few years, it's quite clear that they'll do it again.

Once we get into next year, I'm fully expecting the switchoff target to be pushed back to 'by 2012-2015'. Then it'll go back again. And again. And quite possible again after that.

The more I think about what removing all dependencies on analogue terrestrial so they can take it away means, i'm beginning to think that even my own belief that analogue has at least 10-15 years is an unrealistic timeframe - I really do think that 20 years is more than likely.
CO
Corin
cWathen posted:
I won't stop buying analogue TVs

Just how regularly do you buy analog television receivers? Are you a compulsive purchaser?
NJ
Neil Jones Founding member
cwathen posted:
Away from TVs, the VCR market isn't sustainable at present without analogue equipment there, consumer level VCRs only became available from the start of this year, and account for less than 1% (or in some cases, 0%) of a shop's VCR range. And again, the low end market is entirely comprised of analogue VCRs, with that not looking to change any time soon.


Indeed, when one went to Comet the other week, one saw a good two dozen or so video recorders, not one of them had any digital receiving tuners in them according to the literature so they were all for the analogue transmissions.

As for TV's with built-in DTT/Freeview - Our local Comet will sell them but they're tucked away in the far back corner. When I looked, not one of them stated that this is what you'll need from 2010 if Tony and Gordon and Tessa have their way. It might well be just a glorified child-lock function.

Quote:
But at least DTT TVs and VCRs are available; some equipment (notably pocket TVs) have no digital replacement on the market yet, and no sign of anything appearing for a good for years (from an engineering point of view, a useable pocket DTT TV would surely be quite a challenge).


That will be good to see. Smile

Quote:
The day when analogue equipment will be cut off at source is a long way away, short of government intervention to make the manufacture of analogue equiment illegal (and I don't think even they would propose to do anything quite as ridiculous as that).


Well if they did do that then I suppose any manufacture of analogue equipment (including TVs, videos and what no) that goes on in this country will rapidly disappear over the ocean, even if its just to France, and the EU will probably have a say and use the phrase "consumer choice" as well. Retailers would just then import them back in.

Quote:
The government's target dates are not really targets at all, they're basically just creative bits of marketing to try and shy people away from buying analogue equipment which the government is saying will be obsolete in a few years' time.


As you may know I do share your views on the switch off targets and their general absurdity, and I do believe that they're inpractical given current practises for reasons that have already been discussed. It will take a lot more than what happens now to get digital mainstream. Remember that 2010 only came about because Germany, I believe, are able to switch off analogue by 2010 and the UK government just wanted to look every bit as efficient as that. But considering how Labour have now all but dropped all their previous targets as outlined in the 1997 manifesto for this, that and the other, it wouldn't surprise me if 2010 target is dropped as well when it turns out to be impractical. EIther that or expect the 95% figure (households with access to digital telly) to drop instead to just the right level to turn off in 2010. Whoo.

Quote:
The more I think about what removing all dependencies on analogue terrestrial so they can take it away means, i'm beginning to think that even my own belief that analogue has at least 10-15 years is an unrealistic timeframe - I really do think that 20 years is more than likely.


Possibly more considering analogue equipment is still being made and bought, though I don't know what the average turnover of equipment is per household, if it's anything like mine it's practically zero Smile But let's assume 50% of the TVs bought today or in use today are replaced by 2010 for whatever reason, breakdown or something. That's a hell of a lot of tellies alone. About 23m homes in the UK, that's only 11 and a half million tellies (assuming one telly per household) that get replaced for a DTT enabled goggle box assuming 50% turnover and assuming that the tellies are actually replaced with DTT models and not more analogue bound units.
:-(
A former member
NH
Nick Harvey Founding member
Well, they only do a census in years ending in a "1", so the next will be in 2011, when, I'd wager, 100% of televisions will be digital.
NJ
Neil Jones Founding member
Nick Harvey posted:
Well, they only do a census in years ending in a "1", so the next will be in 2011, when, I'd wager, 100% of televisions will be digital.


Doubt it somehow, for reasons cwathen and myself have already discussed.

Newer posts