NG
But at that point anyone marketing DVB-T2 receivers as anything other than 'Freeview HD' would have been a fool wouldn't they?
Possibly in the short-term, but not in the long-term IMO.
I disagree - anyone marketing DVB-T2 receivers, which had the unique USP of receiving HD, without putting HD in the brand name would have been certifiable...
Sky HD vs Freeview +? Which would one would you think gave you HD?
It's kind of irrelevant now, as new mainstream DVB-T only devices are disappearing.
noggin
Founding member
Yes, but the point is that it wasn't always called Freeview+ and that brand could have been used for the DVB-T2 service if they'd stuck it out a while longer.
But at that point anyone marketing DVB-T2 receivers as anything other than 'Freeview HD' would have been a fool wouldn't they?
Possibly in the short-term, but not in the long-term IMO.
I disagree - anyone marketing DVB-T2 receivers, which had the unique USP of receiving HD, without putting HD in the brand name would have been certifiable...
Sky HD vs Freeview +? Which would one would you think gave you HD?
It's kind of irrelevant now, as new mainstream DVB-T only devices are disappearing.