To What Extent Do You Think Tv Dramas Represent Reality?

TO WHAT EXTENT DO YOU THINK TV DRAMAS REPRESENT REALITY? PLEASE HELP....ITS NOT HOMEWORK ITS HELP ON JOURALISTIC WORK...?

Yeah, right.

Don't post in all caps and don't post b.ollocks

This is the third thread you've started on this.

Do we seriously expect to believe you when you can't even spell "JOURLAISTIC" right?

I wouldn't criticise her spelling if I were you - you couldn't even accurately quote her spelling error when it was right in front of you (unless of course that was your effort to spell 'journalistic', in which case I think you should shut up all together).

You know we were discussing this in the pub last night. I would help natasha, but frankly I don't wanna.

Don't be so mean spirited you lot. It's the season of good will.

Things come over as realistic and believable when they are consistent.

Saying something “isn’t homework” in one thread, but saying it “is coursework” in another, stretches the consistency a tad.

To what extent do you think TVF postings represent reality?

I think this diagram fully and totally conveys my thoughts on the subject:

http://www.rp-networkservices.com/tvforum/uploads/diagram.gif

You're welcome!

http://homepage.mac.com/robertpalmer/tvforum/sig.gif

Wait for the inevitable TVF schism over the placement of the outer red circle, and (of course) Row's attempts to show that this diagram really means you should go and visit his website.
Shouldn't stop a certain contingent from putting Kay in the centre of that diagram though.

But, surely there is but ONE red circle, the inner portion being a continuation of the outer portion, the angular connection on the left hand side being the point of marriage of the concentric parts of the greater whole?

Or do I mean hole?

Depends on whether you are a member of the 'one true faith' which believes that that segment of line should not be there, or a heretic.


I believe this was addressed by the inter-denominational and debate committee of November 2003. Sadly, there was no consensus, which lead to the great blood-letting and schisms whose history I do not need to repeat here.