TV Home Forum

Eurovision 2011 - 10/12/14 May 2011

Dusseldorf (May 2010)

This site closed in March 2021 and is now a read-only archive
GO
gottago
Jon Wells posted:
DVB Cornwall posted:
Not yet Jon. Will add if it becomes available.

Thanks, has this been made available in the past?


They made it available in 2009 but not last year for some reason.
BR
Brekkie
DVB Cornwall posted:
The EBU have released the breakdown of the separate Jury and Televoting

Jury voting
1 --- 251 --- Italy
2 --- 182 --- Azerbaijan
3 --- 168 --- Denmark
4 --- 160 --- Slovenia
5 --- 145 --- Austria
6 --- 119 --- Ireland
7 --- 117 --- Ukraine
8 --- 111 --- Serbia
9 --- 106 --- Sweden
10 --- 104 --- Germany
11 --- 90 --- Bosnia & Herzegovina
11 --- 90 --- France
13 --- 86 --- Romania
14 --- 84 --- Greece
15 --- 82 --- Moldova
16 --- 79 --- Georgia
17 --- 75 --- Finland
18 --- 74 --- Estonia
19 --- 72 --- Iceland
20 --- 66 --- Lithuania
21 --- 60 --- Hungary
22 --- 57 --- United Kingdom
23 --- 53 --- Switzerland
24 --- 38 --- Spain
25 --- 25 --- Russia

Televoting
1 --- 223 --- Azerbaijan
2 --- 221 --- Sweden
3 --- 176 --- Greece
4 --- 168 --- Ukraine
5 --- 166 --- United Kingdom
6 --- 151 --- Bosnia & Herzegovina
7 --- 138 --- Georgia
7 --- 138 --- Russia
9 --- 113 --- Germany
10 --- 101 --- Ireland
11 --- 99 --- Italy
12 --- 98 --- Moldova
13 --- 89 --- Serbia
14 --- 79 --- Romania
15 --- 76 --- France
16 --- 73 --- Spain
17 --- 64 --- Hungary
18 --- 61 --- Denmark
19 --- 60 --- Iceland
20 --- 55 --- Lithuania
21 --- 47 --- Finland
22 --- 39 --- Slovenia
23 --- 32 --- Estonia
24 --- 25 --- Austria
25 --- 2 --- Switzerland

Some considerable variance this year from Jury to Televoting.

Thank you for that. I thought this year with it being close the trend might be broken, but no once again the results show the winner matches the Televote, not the jury - and considering how out of touch the jury are with the viewers it's time they were scrapped. Indeed when the BBC see the result they'll only have themselves to blame - they've sacrificed a 5th place for Blue because Andy Abrahams came (deservedly) last! The voting would still have been neck and neck too with the winner probably not determined until the final vote.

Surprised Ireland did so well (and the UK so bad) with the jury too. And Switzerlands neutral position obviously does it no favours when it comes to Eurovision. Unlike many I wasn't too surprised Italy came 2nd on the night - but quite surprised to see how far ahead they were on the Jury vote. I thought it might be the Televote winning them points. Denmark disapointingly low on the televote too and along with Italy the main winners from having the Jury too - but as ultimately it is only the actual winner that matters at the end of the night that wouldn't have mattered.
DV
DVB Cornwall
UK Jury/Televote breakdowns ....

GRAND FINAL

Combined scores of both Jury and Televote
12 - Ireland
10 - Switzerland
8 - Moldova
7 - Italy
6 - Lithuania
5 - Denmark
4 - Iceland
3 - Sweden
2 - Austria
1 - Spain

Telephone Vote
12 - Ireland
10 - Moldova
8 - Iceland
7 - Lithuania
6 - Spain
5 - Sweden
4 - Greece
3 - Denmark
2 - Hungary
1 - Germany

Jury Vote
12 - Switzerland
10 - Italy
8 - Ireland
7 - Austria
6 - Denmark
5 - Serbia
4 - Georgia
3 - Sweden
2 - Lithuania
1 - Azerbaijan


SEMI-FINAL #1

Combined scores of both Jury and Televote
12 - Lithuania
10 - Hungary
8 - Greece
7 - Iceland
6 - Finland
5 - Poland
4 - Azerbaijan
3 - Portugal
2 - Switzerland
1 - Norway

Telephone Vote
12 - Greece
10 - Lithuania
8 - Poland
7 - Hungary
6 - Iceland
5 - Portugal
4 - Turkey
3 - Finland
2 - Albania
1 - Norway

Jury Vote
12 - Lithuania
10 - Hungary
8 - Finland
7 - Azerbaijan
6 - Iceland
5 - Switzerland
4 - Serbia
3 - Norway
2 - Georgia
1 - Malta


from ……..

WWW.BBC.CO.UK/BLOGS
26-May-2011 @ 19:13
TT
Tumble Tower
DVB Cornwall posted:
The EBU have released the breakdown of the separate Jury and Televoting

Some considerable variance this year from Jury to Televoting.

It would appear that the lists you posted were:

Jury Votes: what the final result would have been with just all countries' jury vote points added together.
Televoting: what the final result would have been with just all countries' televoting points added together.

Anyway it's interesting to see how badly the UK would have done with just judges' votes. Did the juries in the participating countries other than UK really think Blue "I Can" was that bad?

Under jury votes alone, Georgia and Moldova wouldn't have done as well as they actually did with combined jury / televoting results. However Georgia and Moldova would have still finished above UK on just jury votes; did the juries across Europe really think they were better than UK?

Here in the UK, did the UK jury really think Georgia was the 7th best song to award it 4 points?
Last edited by Tumble Tower on 28 May 2011 3:14pm
JO
Jon
Tumble Tower posted:

Jury Votes: what the final result would have been with just all countries' jury vote points added together.
Televoting: what the final result would have been with just all countries' televoting points added together.

Thanks for clarifying that, I read that post and was very confused as to what this list was as thought it seemed to be a random collection of names of countries and numbers.
BR
Brekkie
Tumble Tower posted:
DVB Cornwall posted:
The EBU have released the breakdown of the separate Jury and Televoting

Some considerable variance this year from Jury to Televoting.

It would appear that the lists you posted were:

Jury Votes: what the final result would have been with just all countries' jury vote points added together.
Televoting: what the final result would have been with just all countries' televoting points added together.

It would appear that the comment you posted was:

Pointless: didn't actually need you to explain the perfectly obvious.
TT
Tumble Tower
Brekkie posted:
It would appear that the comment you posted was:

Pointless: didn't actually need you to explain the perfectly obvious.

OK. Enough of that.

What now bugs me is, did the UK jury really think Georgia was the 7th best song to award it 4 points? I thought Georgia's song was terrible, i.e. a load of nauseating garbage with unnecessary use of strobe lighting. It and Moldova both deserved last place with nul points in the final, IMHO. Better still, neither country should have qualified; other countries were more deserving of the places they took.
GO
gottago
Tumble Tower posted:
Brekkie posted:
It would appear that the comment you posted was:

Pointless: didn't actually need you to explain the perfectly obvious.

OK. Enough of that.

What now bugs me is, did the UK jury really think Georgia was the 7th best song to award it 4 points? I thought Georgia's song was terrible, i.e. a load of nauseating garbage with unnecessary use of strobe lighting. It and Moldova both deserved last place with nul points in the final, IMHO. Better still, neither country should have qualified; other countries were more deserving of the places they took.


Georgia was brilliant in the end. It looked like it was going to be a disaster when it was originally selected but it was so much better when they replaced the lead singer. Great use of strobe lighting as well.
MA
madmusician
Tumble Tower posted:
Brekkie posted:
It would appear that the comment you posted was:

Pointless: didn't actually need you to explain the perfectly obvious.

OK. Enough of that.

What now bugs me is, did the UK jury really think Georgia was the 7th best song to award it 4 points? I thought Georgia's song was terrible, i.e. a load of nauseating garbage with unnecessary use of strobe lighting. It and Moldova both deserved last place with nul points in the final, IMHO. Better still, neither country should have qualified; other countries were more deserving of the places they took.


Quite probably yes, given that that's what the results breakdown says. It's unlikely they'd make it up, isn't it...?! Shocked
TT
Tumble Tower
gottago posted:
Georgia was brilliant in the end. It looked like it was going to be a disaster when it was originally selected but it was so much better when they replaced the lead singer. Great use of strobe lighting as well.

You really liked the use of strobe lighting? Personally I think the EBU should ban the use of strobe lighting in the Eurovision Song Contest.

madmusician posted:
Tumble Tower posted:
What now bugs me is, did the UK jury really think Georgia was the 7th best song to award it 4 points?

Quite probably yes, given that that's what the results breakdown says. It's unlikely they'd make it up, isn't it...?! Shocked

Of course they wouldn't make it up. What I meant was, I'm surprised the UK jury thought Georgia had the 7th best song in of the 24 finalists (other than UK) to warrant giving it 4 points.
NE
Neo
gottago posted:

Georgia was brilliant in the end. It looked like it was going to be a disaster when it was originally selected but it was so much better when they replaced the lead singer. Great use of strobe lighting as well.

Over-use of strobe lighting I think and not very good song/singing - too shouty.
TT
Tumble Tower
Neo posted:
Over-use of strobe lighting I think and not very good song/singing - too shouty.

Bravo! Smile I'm glad someone else agrees with me that Georgia wasn't up to much.

Newer posts