I think you misread. I think Stockholm in 2000 was the game-changer. Compare it to Ireland in 1997, Birmingham in 1998 and Jerusalem in 1999 and there is a total step-change in coverage and ambition. Personally I thought Jerusalem in 1998 was a bit of a let down after Ireland in 1997 and Birmingham in 1998. (Very limited space I guess - but the scripting felt less tailored to the song - and I don't think LED had quite arrived when they used it - just too coarse)
Well the Moscow 2009 stage was designed by the team who did one of the Irish contests ISTR - and it was amazing. As I'm sure was the price tag.
I was incredibly impressed with the Oslo staging last year. They didn't try to better Moscow - they took a different tack - and I thought it was all the better for it.
Hasn't the NRK producer for Oslo taken over from Svante at the EBU? If so - I suspect the EBU would probably dictate to RTE who was and wasn't approved to direct the show... (But I doubt it would get to that)
Of course many broadcasters don't have in-house directors for these kinds of shows anyway - the industry is much more freelance based.
The BBC don't have a single in-house staff director in BBC Vision Entertainment any more (apart from the P/Ds in Events which is technically a part of Entertainment). In fact outside of BBC News (and the Nations) there are very few staff directors at the BBC. There is absolutely no doubt if the Beeb won the contest it would be a freelancer directing (in fact I think it was the last time!)
That's interesting re the BBC noggin - you learn something new every day. I wonder would Jonathan Bullen get the gig?
You're evidently correct about directors. It's only when you list them that you see the extent to which the Swedes took over. It would be interesting if larger countries with their own directors had won during the 2000s - Eurovision could have gone in a slightly different directorial direction to that we have now...
Fully agreed about Greece. Not only was the spidercam over used and in jarring SD, the reliance on pedestals was surely the heaviest since the 1990s. There were two problems with this: firstly the stage was too high for comfortable ped use (as noggin has often pointed out, Eurovision is rightly a television event now - the venue audience is secondary), and secondly, the emergence of heavy jib and steadicam use has meant peds mainly fill the gaps with close-ups these days, which Greece also did to a degree, but without taking account of the high proportion of ped use. So the ped shots featured little of the dynamisim expected of a ped-dominant production. If that makes sense. It was a frustratingly erratic production to watch with many dull and
'oops, what's going on here'
moments.
And yes, I meant to say Stockholm, not Oslo as the turning point. It really upped the stakes. Kattis and Anders were supremely confident, professional and delightfully irreverent too. A very sophsticated show.
Yep, Moscow's stage was designed by set designer John Casey (now based in New York), who designed the 1997 stage for RTÉ, and was involved in 1994 and 1995 also.