TT
After seeing both semis (SF1 in real time, SF2 in chasing playback):
Positives:
Singing began only a few minutes after the start.
Short postcard sequences - the gaps between songs seem to be getting smaller year by year.
Negatives:
Use of strobe lighting (Turkey did it every chorus), it's an unnecessary gimmick that spoils it really.
BBC showing their own bits at certain times (e.g. after the singing ended), so UK viewers missed whatever was on stage then. At least I'll be able to see the proper stuff on the official DVD when it comes out.
Just for your info, I'm currently watching songs from the 1980 Eurovision Song Contest on You Tube, which took place at Congresgebouw, The Hague, Netherlands. Back then they didn't use strobe/laser lighting effects, and it looked plenty good enough, so why do we need them 30 years on? It's a song contest, not a lighting effects contest.
Positives:
Singing began only a few minutes after the start.
Short postcard sequences - the gaps between songs seem to be getting smaller year by year.
Negatives:
Use of strobe lighting (Turkey did it every chorus), it's an unnecessary gimmick that spoils it really.
BBC showing their own bits at certain times (e.g. after the singing ended), so UK viewers missed whatever was on stage then. At least I'll be able to see the proper stuff on the official DVD when it comes out.
Just for your info, I'm currently watching songs from the 1980 Eurovision Song Contest on You Tube, which took place at Congresgebouw, The Hague, Netherlands. Back then they didn't use strobe/laser lighting effects, and it looked plenty good enough, so why do we need them 30 years on? It's a song contest, not a lighting effects contest.
Last edited by Tumble Tower on 28 May 2010 4:29pm