The only thing I found good about the Beebs election 97 was the funny little figures (no not Dimbelby, Snow and Paxman) they used for their graphics.
Here are some of the things posted on the GE97 site, the day after, they did reports throughout the night on the coverage, and here is what they all said.
Buildup to the election:
ITN claim they won the ratings war during the campaign, but will they come out on top during the night?
Can Dimbelby, D. fight off the challenge of Dimbelby, J.? And which way will Peter Snow swing?
Or will you be watching BBC2's alternative view?
Channel 4 does it differently. Find does it do it better?
(Channel 5)
What will the new kid on the block have to offer?
Sky's 24 hour campaign coverage lead the way. How will their results service match up?
--------
Election night reports:
Sky:
Peaks:An almost breathless sense of occasion (2.09am)
Results are coming in so fast that the 'Virtual Studio' has now been all but abandoned.
Oh look, it would just be easier, instead of all this curt and paste rubbish, if went and actually read the reports on GE97.
Link@
http://www.ge97.co.uk/election_day/media_watch/
Click on the pictures on the side, to sum up the BBC's coverage they said:
BBC want to know the word for a group of excited Liberal Democrats to desribe the Lib Dems at party HQ.
David Steele doesn't want to count his chickens... Last time 18% only meant 20 seats!'
BBC cut away from Hamilton's losing speech to go to Edinburgh. (That says it all!).
And anyway, from what I know, a few of you are perhaps too young to really remember the last election night, the BBC's coverage was not the best as they were stuck in a studio about the size of a desert that cost millions, waste of money.
And I heard the BBC being attacked by yet another party today, yesterday it was Labour, today the Conservatives, telling them to 'Get back to real issues', and 'It is typical of the BBC'.
So they are not in favour with either of the main parties at the moment.
And remeber this, Sky have longest serving political correspondent, in Adam Boulton, who was first to announce the election results accurately since 1992.
And anyway, why would they want it to be corporate, previous election have never been corporate, they will not change now.
The graphics are apparently for both the Beeb and Sky, very hot!
And on the topic of impartial, everyone in their right minds know that the BBC is firmly Blair's Broadcasting Corp... read it and weep boys:
'If this sounds a bit rule-of-thumb, independent academic studies of TV coverage in the 92, 97 actually found Sky News the 'most balanced' of the 3 national news services. '
- Extract from :
http://www.sky.com/skynews/storytemplate/storytoppic/0,,0-1010717,00.html