I was asking about this on
the other place recently as I'd had my eye on a TV that had a resolution of 1366 x 768 and had been wondering if that would make the picture inferior in any way.
1366x768 displays were pretty common at one point, as Full 1080 panels were originally quite expensive to manufacture. However they have the disadvantage that 1920x1080 and 1280x720 (the two HD formats) both have to be scaled to fit the 1366x768 display resolution, and obviously don't deliver the full HD resolution that Blu-ray at 1920x1080/24p can deliver. For small screen sizes this may not be a major issue (depends on viewing distance obviously) - but once you get to 37" and above it could be -again it depends on viewing distance.
Many 1366x768 displays also have permanent overscan on non-native resolutions - and in fact some won't accept their native resolution as an input format at all, or if they do it is via an analogue VGA input and stuck at 60Hz (which is pants if you want to watch European SD/HD TV via your PC - as we're 50Hz here) Some models do allow you to feed 1366x768 via HDMI (or DVI) and some allow you to feed this at 50Hz - though getting a PC to feed at this resolution can also be an issue.
For some reason 1280x720 LCD panels were never really produced in large numbers (which would at least favour 1280x720 HD content) - I think because 1366x768 is a 16:9 version of 1024x768 which is a more PC-friendly resolution? If you plan on feeding a PC to the screen, then native resolution is important, along with 1:1 pixel mapping, as without these you end up with very blurry text as it has been scaled)
(I have a small 22" 1680x1050 - 16:10 - HDTV for my bedroom, and my PC doesn't like feeding it 1680x1050 at 50Hz only at 60Hz - and I haven't had time to delve into creating a custom mode)
Last edited by noggin on 23 November 2009 11:28am