TV Home Forum

DOGS

No complaints about DOGs, please (October 2017)

This site closed in March 2021 and is now a read-only archive
AN
Andrew Founding member
TVam's wasn't as sophisticated, but as it was a simple monochrome key with just hour markers and hands, it was less obtrusive in some ways. It looks electronic, but a very simple monochrome key, but it could have been keyed from a mechanical clock (or on the day the regular clock failed it could have been an electronic clock replaced by a mechanical clock keyed instead)


How could it be monochrome? The TV-am analogue clock started off yellow!

See just after 11mins in here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qy4k2pg3BXw

Or do you not mean "monochrome" as in "black and white"?

There's another video on Youtube which has the timecode burnt into it of the first 3hr 15min broadcast from TV-am and if you watch it long enough the minute hand moves every 15 seconds. I'd have argued that a mechanical clock would move gradually and smoothly, not "jump" as you can see on that clock.


Talking about TV-AM, it never fails to amaze how ropey the main ident was, it looks like a picture done in felt tips, cut out and glued to a board. Meanwhile stuff like the Daybreak intro also shown in the above video, were able to use much more superior computer generated titles.
IT
IndigoTucker
The Daybreak titles are really poor CGI though, really low frame rate, and a horrible cut to the high res logo at the end.
JA
james-2001
Well poor by modern standards maybe, much less so in 1983!
JA
james-2001
It's not unthinkable that there was some sort of hardware capable of generating a clock by 1983.


It would be hard to believe there wasn't one. After all, both BBC1 and 2 had been using an electronically generated full-screen clock for a couple of years by that time, and Channel 4 had one too, so being able to generate one to put in the corner of the screen would hardly have been much of an issue.
MA
Markymark
I would have thought that the original TVam clock would have been an analogue mechanism keyed onto the picture. As I said on the last page it was a last minute addition, I doubt they'd have been able to suddenly magic up a digital solution to that in a few weeks


The fact that the exact same design was used by France 2 suggests it was a piece of kit that generated a clock. The aliasing of the hands suggest it's a digital graphic rather than a live shot of a clock keyed.

It's not unthinkable that there was some sort of hardware capable of generating a clock by 1983.


I'm sure there would have been, and as for the Tvam clock being 'last minute' ( no pun intended) it was probably a last minute late delivery from the manufacturer!
IS
Inspector Sands
It's not unthinkable that there was some sort of hardware capable of generating a clock by 1983.


It would be hard to believe there wasn't one. After all, both BBC1 and 2 had been using an electronically generated full-screen clock for a couple of years by that time, and Channel 4 had one too, so being able to generate one to put in the corner of the screen would hardly have been much of an issue.

It depends what you mean by 'available'. Yes it was certainly possible technologically, but that doesn't mean it was available at the sort of notice that TVam had. The BBCs on screen clocks including the BAT used at breakfast were designed and created in-house in their massive R&D department, they weren't bought off the shelf or knocked up in a couple of weeks.


No idea about channel 4's, it might not have been digital at the start but if it was then I'd have thought that would have gone through a similar design process at the IBAs engineering dept.
IS
Inspector Sands

Talking about TV-AM, it never fails to amaze how ropey the main ident was, it looks like a picture done in felt tips, cut out and glued to a board.

The main ident you can probably excuse as it was a watercolour effect.


Remember though that's what television looked like in 1983: cameras pointing at card, handing drawn and cut graphics, cell animation, letraset captions etc. TVam looked modern then compared with what most viewers saw the rest of the day on ITV!

Mind you, when you compare the last days of the outgoing stations in 1981 and the first day of their replacements they all look a world apart from each other
Last edited by Inspector Sands on 19 October 2017 8:45am - 2 times in total
JW
JamesWorldNews
I'm sitting in a waiting room of a big office block and literally peeing myself laughing at the initial indignation and seriousness with which this thread started.

Thank you TVF for brightening up an otherwise difficult day.
NJ
Neil Jones Founding member
As things turned out the Daybreak titles were the least of the station's worries but the theme was later reused for the Frost on Sunday segment.

Suppose the more unusual aspect in the grand scale of things was just how long TV-am held onto the watercolours and used the GMB titles for. By the late 80s they were beginning to look dated and was pretty much anachronistic by 1992. While other aspects of the presentation were revised over the years and various strands had their own titles, I was always of the impression the look of the main programme presentation wise in retrospect always looked stuck in the 80s.

I suppose its plausible the entire operation was ripe for a major rebrand after 1992 had the channel survived, and Tele Matin today shows an analogue clock doesn't have to take up an obscene amount of screen space either.
MA
Markymark
It's not unthinkable that there was some sort of hardware capable of generating a clock by 1983.


It would be hard to believe there wasn't one. After all, both BBC1 and 2 had been using an electronically generated full-screen clock for a couple of years by that time, and Channel 4 had one too, so being able to generate one to put in the corner of the screen would hardly have been much of an issue.

It depends what you mean by 'available'. Yes it was certainly possible technologically, but that doesn't mean it was available at the sort of notice that TVam had. The BBCs on screen clocks including the BAT used at breakfast were designed and created in-house in their massive R&D department, they weren't bought off the shelf or knocked up in a couple of weeks.


No idea about channel 4's, it might not have been digital at the start but if it was then I'd have thought that would have gone through a similar design process at the IBAs engineering dept.


C4's clock was produced by a GEC McMicheal crate, from the outset in Nov 82,
NG
noggin Founding member

The BBCs on screen clocks including the BAT used at breakfast were designed and created in-house in their massive R&D department, they weren't bought off the shelf or knocked up in a couple of weeks.


Not sure they were created by BBC Research. Most hardware was created either by Designs Department or Studio Capital Projects Dept AUI - which were very separate. R&D were very much the blue-sky thinkers. If they did develop hardware to be actually deployed, it then went elsewhere to be engineered into a product and manufactured.

This has some information on the GNAT which was used by the BBC towards the end of the life of on-screen pres clocks in the UK http://www.bbceng.info/Designs/designs_reminiscences/richard_russell_part2/rtrbbc.html

This details the earlier, c1979, BBC Two electronic clock http://www.bbceng.info/Designs/designs_reminiscences/Richard_Russell/rtrdd.html

Both made by Designs Dept. not Research Dept.
IS
Inspector Sands

Not sure they were created by BBC Research. Most hardware was created either by Designs Department or Studio Capital Projects Dept AUI - which were very separate. R&D were very much the blue-sky thinkers. If they did develop hardware to be actually deployed, it then went elsewhere to be engineered into a product and manufactured.

Both made by Designs Dept. not Research Dept.

Thanks for that, I was just using that as a generic term.

Newer posts