RR
I didn't enjoy it, but one thing bugged me. I've never known any hookers to have sex with their pants on. Come on ITV2, if you're going to promise raunchiness, show it!
RR
None. But you wouldn't expect someone you were paying to have sex with to leave their pants on now, would you? It made the sex look very unconvincing.
OH
This week's episode seemed to be VERY fuzzy - the ITV2 and XXL dogs were pin-sharp though!
ohwhatanight
Founding member
Nick Harvey posted:
Just watched the first ten minutes of it, tonight, off a DVD recording, but had to give up because of the dreadfully "fuzzy" quality of both the video and the audio.
No it wasn't a problem with the DVD, as the other stuff, recorded to the same standard on the same disc, was perfectly okay.
Sorry, ITV, but it was rubbish. I very much doubt if the next episode will get as many viewers. I certainly won't bother with it any more.
No it wasn't a problem with the DVD, as the other stuff, recorded to the same standard on the same disc, was perfectly okay.
Sorry, ITV, but it was rubbish. I very much doubt if the next episode will get as many viewers. I certainly won't bother with it any more.
This week's episode seemed to be VERY fuzzy - the ITV2 and XXL dogs were pin-sharp though!
NH
Nick Harvey
Founding member
I didn't even bother to record it this week.
If they can't sort out their technical standards, then they don't deserve the viewers.
If they can't sort out their technical standards, then they don't deserve the viewers.
NH
I do believe the word I actually used was standards , not problems .
Kindly read and inwardly digest the original post before going off on one.
Thank you.
Nick Harvey
Founding member
markstewart posted:
Oh come on, your reasons for watching this are far from technical
problems
.
I do believe the word I actually used was standards , not problems .
Kindly read and inwardly digest the original post before going off on one.
Thank you.
MA
I do believe the word I actually used was standards , not problems .
Kindly read and inwardly digest the original post before going off on one.
Thank you.
Makes not one shred of difference to what I said.
Nick Harvey posted:
markstewart posted:
Oh come on, your reasons for watching this are far from technical
problems
.
I do believe the word I actually used was standards , not problems .
Kindly read and inwardly digest the original post before going off on one.
Thank you.
Makes not one shred of difference to what I said.
I was half expecting a "cameraman having a w*nk" joke from him at least. Come on Charlie 