SR
If i'm at home and its on, This Morning and Loose Women are just the perfect level of banality to stick on in the background. On the whole both programmes are okay although i do realise that there can be the occasional annoying segment; Dont get me started on that no brained Brick head. However all of that is preferable to the whole antiques situation... so it is.
The issue with This Morning is it now more often falls into the "Light Entertainment" category, where Daybroke cannot do that because it has a news remit. TVMockerIdentityXIV... er Daybroken suffers from the lack of a credible News Anchor so regardless of how much they want to be like BBC Breakfast it is doomed to failure. Perhaps this Newshour will give Kelly/Jones a credible lead in to allow them to do more of the celebrity lead nonsense without being inhibited by the need to go back to news every fifteen minutes.
Currently IMO, the only channel that presents what i would call Hard News; ie, the presentation is no different to the rest of the schedule, is SkySunrise. This is something that is missing from the other morning television doohickeys... i dont need the celebrity guff in the mornings, i need "all the news in fifteen minutes every fifteen minutes"... where have i heard that before.
Regardless of whether Daybreak is successful or not with its new format, i wont be watching as both it and BBC Breakfast fail to give me what i want... NEWS. The BBC even succeed in giving me what i dont want... Grumpy State. (Hopefully that one is far enough away from the real name to not annoy the lawyers.)
Hmm... Richard and Judy has a ring to it... perhaps they should change the name of This Morning to "Schofe and Booby" or on fridays "Holmes and Wifey" and definitely change the other programme to "Moose Women".
So is it Easter again soon or is that later today?
I hate dissing a programme before its launch, but past experience says that it will be a load of old Snowmen Growlers.
The issue with This Morning is it now more often falls into the "Light Entertainment" category, where Daybroke cannot do that because it has a news remit. TVMockerIdentityXIV... er Daybroken suffers from the lack of a credible News Anchor so regardless of how much they want to be like BBC Breakfast it is doomed to failure. Perhaps this Newshour will give Kelly/Jones a credible lead in to allow them to do more of the celebrity lead nonsense without being inhibited by the need to go back to news every fifteen minutes.
Currently IMO, the only channel that presents what i would call Hard News; ie, the presentation is no different to the rest of the schedule, is SkySunrise. This is something that is missing from the other morning television doohickeys... i dont need the celebrity guff in the mornings, i need "all the news in fifteen minutes every fifteen minutes"... where have i heard that before.
Regardless of whether Daybreak is successful or not with its new format, i wont be watching as both it and BBC Breakfast fail to give me what i want... NEWS. The BBC even succeed in giving me what i dont want... Grumpy State. (Hopefully that one is far enough away from the real name to not annoy the lawyers.)
Hmm... Richard and Judy has a ring to it... perhaps they should change the name of This Morning to "Schofe and Booby" or on fridays "Holmes and Wifey" and definitely change the other programme to "Moose Women".
So is it Easter again soon or is that later today?
I hate dissing a programme before its launch, but past experience says that it will be a load of old Snowmen Growlers.