IS
Daybreak is undoubtadely a more expensive programme to make, GMTV had been wound down towards the end. Plus millions were spent on refurbing the studio/gallery and promoting the launch, that's all got to be earnt back in revenue somehow
Any programme will 'haemorrhage' money until it starts making some back
I understand exactly what 'break even' means. The only real extra expense ITV has gone to is presenter salaries, and the bulk of that can be written off on prime time shows. And lets not forget that GMTV was profitable when it came off the air, so Daybreak already had a fairly decent starting point.
Daybreak is undoubtadely a more expensive programme to make, GMTV had been wound down towards the end. Plus millions were spent on refurbing the studio/gallery and promoting the launch, that's all got to be earnt back in revenue somehow
Quote:
Whilst break even is probably not the right term to use, the original question was 'is Daybreak hemorrhaging money?' If it is showing signs of this, even after just 3 weeks, it can't be written off with a comment like 'well you can't expect any better in just a few weeks'.
Any programme will 'haemorrhage' money until it starts making some back