TV Home Forum

Daybreak - the launch onwards

From 6am (September 2010)

This site closed in March 2021 and is now a read-only archive
PL
tellyboxPLUS
Gráinne Seoige presenting the show today alongside Dan. I Did not see much of it as I was making the most of an extra lie in (My schools pipes have broke down). Tasmin was back on Newsdesk after her short break. But still No Adrian or Christine I assume there back Monday?.


hows your dog
SI
sir
chris posted:
sir posted:
Daybreak will find its feet late spring to summer. They will be able to open up the view behind them and there will a recongised system on the way the program flows.

They will probably get around 900,000 - 1,100,000 viewers for this period.


Yes. A big window solves the problems of all struggling/failing TV programmes. Rolling Eyes

I know this is a TV Presentation forum, but sometimes I genuinly think people on here think it's all that matters in the world...


However there are viewers which will see this as an aleternative to the boring backgrounds of BBC Breakfast and Sunrise on Sky and may switch for the summer period.
GS
Gavin Scott Founding member
sir posted:
chris posted:
sir posted:
Daybreak will find its feet late spring to summer. They will be able to open up the view behind them and there will a recongised system on the way the program flows.

They will probably get around 900,000 - 1,100,000 viewers for this period.


Yes. A big window solves the problems of all struggling/failing TV programmes. Rolling Eyes

I know this is a TV Presentation forum, but sometimes I genuinly think people on here think it's all that matters in the world...


However there are viewers which will see this as an aleternative to the boring backgrounds of BBC Breakfast and Sunrise on Sky and may switch for the summer period.


People don't tune in to the TV to look out a window. An attractive set is nice; but if the content is pants they're not going to watch.
GI
ginofish
sir posted:
chris posted:
sir posted:
Daybreak will find its feet late spring to summer. They will be able to open up the view behind them and there will a recongised system on the way the program flows.

They will probably get around 900,000 - 1,100,000 viewers for this period.


Yes. A big window solves the problems of all struggling/failing TV programmes. Rolling Eyes

I know this is a TV Presentation forum, but sometimes I genuinly think people on here think it's all that matters in the world...


However there are viewers which will see this as an aleternative to the boring backgrounds of BBC Breakfast and Sunrise on Sky and may switch for the summer period.


People don't tune in to the TV to look out a window. An attractive set is nice; but if the content is pants they're not going to watch.
It's not just about the Quality of Daybreak though it's the Quantity. It starts off Okay with the news until about 8 Minutes past the hour and then about a 6 Minute review for the Papers with 'In the Mix' but then after that it does get full of competition, 60 Second advice clips and things such as Dog's lifting a leg up at the same time as its Owner. It's not the On-Screen team who by the way is miles stronger than GMTV. It's the people producing the show that stayed on from GMTV when the programme started on Day One it was the perfect mix of News, Interviews and Light Hearted stuff they would have in depth reports and the correspondents and interviewees in the studio to talk about the stories. They had one or two political interviews but now there’s none of that.
GS
Gavin Scott Founding member
It's not the On-Screen team who by the way is miles stronger than GMTV. It's the people producing the show...


Viewers aren't interested in the blame game. They don't care if Christine is *awesome* and Adrian is *hysterical* - if the show is a pile of plop they won't watch - and then everyone has failed.

By the way - you're inexplicably using random capital letters. They only go at the start of a sentence, or the name of a particular person, place or object (a "proper noun").
AN
all new Phil
The content is the problem and I'm sure they'll get into a decent pattern soon enough. I think they need to watch a few days-worth of Sunrise to see just how they go from one item to the next and keep up the pace. I could watch Sunrise for a lot longer than I could Daybreak, as it holds my interest - it's upbeat and friendly but still professional. There's a bit of banter, but it doesn't take over like it sometimes does on Daybreak.

As has been correctly pointed out, the on-screen presenting team is really good and certainly not the issue. I'd maybe ditch the news summaries and incorporate it more into the rest of the show - I saw the first twenty minutes of so this morning and just didn't feel like I'd learnt much.
JD
jdav
I saw the first twenty minutes of so this morning and just didn't feel like I'd learnt much.


Yeah there is a lot of padding out that time. Theres a lot of 'whats coming up information', instead of actually giving you content.
EE
EdExcel
More ideas for Daybreak if they thinking about a revamp.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1rUQOTTy4o8
HA
harshy Founding member
today's show wasn't too bad with Grainne and Dan, but I won't be watching when the two idiots are back.

Shame we only saw the backdrop for about 15 minutes, but of course that's what people are not watching for.
Last edited by harshy on 6 January 2011 9:26pm - 2 times in total
DD
DarkestDreams
More ideas for Daybreak if they thinking about a revamp.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1rUQOTTy4o8


Those huge plasmas look great.
SC
Schwing
It's not the On-Screen team who by the way is miles stronger than GMTV. It's the people producing the show...


Viewers aren't interested in the blame game. They don't care if Christine is *awesome* and Adrian is *hysterical* - if the show is a pile of plop they won't watch - and then everyone has failed.

By the way - you're inexplicably using random capital letters. They only go at the start of a sentence, or the name of a particular person, place or object (a "proper noun").


Now now, Gavin, be careful. I corrected ginofish on his spelling, punctuation and grammar once (actually, more than once) and was chastised by the moderators.

That aside, you're right on the content issue but what strikes me most is that nobody has really thought about what people want to watch in the morning. It appears that now, more than ever, people want to know what is actually happening in the country and around the world and would like a little bit of 'substance' to back it up. This is one of the reasons for Breakfast and Sunrise performing so well and increasing reach and share. In 15 minutes on either of those you know:

a) the headlines;
b) the latest developments on a story that might actually have an effect on families, housewives and working mothers, etc. (such as MMR jabs, the flu jab, the rising cost of petrol);
c) how England performed overnight in the Ashes (or whatever sporting headline is appropriate); and
d) what the weather is forecast to be.

Of course, both Breakfast and Sunrise have another feather in their caps - the on-screen talent. It's a huge bonus that both have their own versions of a housewife's favourite (Bill or Eamonn) and in Breakfast's case two working mothers who appear to a) lead relatively normal lives and b) suffer the same hardships as the rest of us.

In the States, it's noticeable that the morning shows reserve the fluff pieces for later in the broadcast. The first 15 minutes of the broadcast is dominated by the headlines, a throw to the news anchor for the rest of the day's stories, a little sport and the weather. Major interviews - including with members of Congress, etc. - run anywhere between 7.15am and 8.15am. Much of the lighter entertainment-based information comes after 8.30am. This is one of the reasons behind the decision of NBC to extend the Today Show into a 3rd, and then 4th, hour. Equally, the most popular cable news morning show is Fox & Friends, a show that - despite any political leanings - will give you the headlines, sports and weather in 15 minutes and tell you how the latest bailout of a failing industry might impact upon you.
AN
Andrew Founding member
I only see Daybreak for half an hour after 7.30, and during that time I learn hardly anything about the day's news, no regional news etc.

All I've seen this week is the sport, the 'Transformation Street' feature which is well and truly in GMTV territory, the competition and 'Something Cool...'

Newer posts