Seriously, comparing getting pregnant to posing for professional nude pictures?
I mean, seriously????????????
You've completely misunderstood what I was saying. I was saying if sex and nudity and public is so very wrong, that The Sun could pull up a potentially private photo (there is no way this photo was to be released in a Page 3-style shoot) of someone doing something frankly natural (I'm not saying it's right, simply that she didn't do anything most married men haven't seen before) and people on here believe that person should lose their future, unrelated employment because of it then clearly we're in a society where the very knowledge that someone has had sex would have similar repercussions.
Clearly those aren't my views, but it's a valid argument nonetheless. I also struggle to see the legal grounds for terminating her employment, given said pictures were taken some time before her apparent appointment to Daybreak and at that time she was not a representative, face or associate of Daybreak, GMTV or her new employers. She also has done nothing illegal and I don't see hundreds of people protesting outside The Sun's offices every time they print a Page 3...
And why are you under the assumption I am a child house?
Because you appeared on this forum at the same time as many students tend to as we approach the long Summer holidays and, like many students, have consistently bad and rushed spelling, grammar and punctuation. You also spoke largely in 'txt' form to begin with and tend not to listen to other posters yet rack up quite a post count.
In your defense you have improved considerably over the past days.
If you are not a minor then I apologise for that assumption, but my previous post made no reference to your age. I was genuinely interested to know what you were asking, as you're post wasn't clear. I wouldn't otherwise have gone to the effort of quoting you.
quite. The bottom line (no pun intended), is this-
can she still do her job and have credibility in doing it?
It's too early to say, but it's probably a no.
I can't imagine Tasmin Lucia Khan has been appointed based on journalistic credentials - mainly because, compared to many other broadcasters who I'm sure would have love that position, she doesn't have many.
Even the "insider" on one of the tabloids claimed she was "young, ambitious, attractive ... just the kind we want" - if they're hiring her mainly based on her youthfulness, looks and ambition then that photo only boosts their reasoning for appointing her.