TV Home Forum

in this day and age...

(January 2005)

This site closed in March 2021 and is now a read-only archive
GJ
GJ05
gregmc posted:
Barney Boo posted:
Just over 14 hours. My, how your reactions are sharpening.
And L*xton implies no-one in particular.

The fact you've clearly made the assumption this refers to you is most definitely not the fault of me.
If I have falsely assumed you are assuming my post refers to you, but instead you're doing the good thing by reporting anything with the possibility of offending anyone, then I do apologise - you are a good samartian, and we need more people like you.


here here, get rid of prats like GJ05 etc.


why i am i the prat?
TV
tvarksouthwest
Barney Boo posted:
Just over 14 hours. My, how your reactions are sharpening.
And L*xton implies no-one in particular.

Do you honestly think I was born yesterday?
RO
roo
GJ05 posted:
gregmc posted:
Barney Boo posted:
Just over 14 hours. My, how your reactions are sharpening.
And L*xton implies no-one in particular.

The fact you've clearly made the assumption this refers to you is most definitely not the fault of me.
If I have falsely assumed you are assuming my post refers to you, but instead you're doing the good thing by reporting anything with the possibility of offending anyone, then I do apologise - you are a good samartian, and we need more people like you.


here here, get rid of prats like GJ05 etc.


why i am i the prat?

I couldn't put it better myself.
RO
roo
tvarksouthwest posted:
Barney Boo posted:
Just over 14 hours. My, how your reactions are sharpening.
And L*xton implies no-one in particular.

Do you honestly think I was born yesterday?

No, because you would be one hell of a kid to have acheived the reputation you have in a day.
GR
gregmc
GJ05 posted:
gregmc posted:
Barney Boo posted:
Just over 14 hours. My, how your reactions are sharpening.
And L*xton implies no-one in particular.

The fact you've clearly made the assumption this refers to you is most definitely not the fault of me.
If I have falsely assumed you are assuming my post refers to you, but instead you're doing the good thing by reporting anything with the possibility of offending anyone, then I do apologise - you are a good samartian, and we need more people like you.


here here, get rid of prats like GJ05 etc.


why i am i the prat?


You have only been here five seconds and your going round telling people that their wrong, or their mocks are crap. You give no constructive critisisum. I feel that all new members are suddenly asumed to be prats because of people "like" you. Most new members are perfectly decent people. I must admit, some are problems. I dont want to offend you, but if you stopped slagging people off, maybe you would be more popular on the forum.
GJ
GJ05
gregmc posted:
GJ05 posted:
gregmc posted:
Barney Boo posted:
Just over 14 hours. My, how your reactions are sharpening.
And L*xton implies no-one in particular.

The fact you've clearly made the assumption this refers to you is most definitely not the fault of me.
If I have falsely assumed you are assuming my post refers to you, but instead you're doing the good thing by reporting anything with the possibility of offending anyone, then I do apologise - you are a good samartian, and we need more people like you.


here here, get rid of prats like GJ05 etc.


why i am i the prat?


You have only been here five seconds and your going round telling people that their wrong, or their mocks are crap. You give no constructive critisisum. I feel that all new members are suddenly asumed to be prats because of people "like" you. Most new members are perfectly decent people. I must admit, some are problems. I dont want to offend you, but if you stopped slagging people off, maybe you would be more popular on the forum.


i have not said that any mock is "crap"
i do give consructive critisisum

Quote:
i like the second mock better, i am not sure about the colouring of the first mock.
the only thing is the 2005 text, i don't really like it


greg

Newer posts