MN
Most people won't be bothered by the fact that The Guardian is spending £85 million to replace their printing presses; after all, they don't have to buy a Guardian when they want to read The Times...
MarkN
Founding member
marksi posted:
Rather hypocritical from a newspaper which has just spent
£85M
to replace printing presses three years earlier than planned in order to change the size of the paper to be neither broadsheet nor tabloid...
Most people won't be bothered by the fact that The Guardian is spending £85 million to replace their printing presses; after all, they don't have to buy a Guardian when they want to read The Times...