TV Home Forum

Daily Mail's BBC-Bashing Watch News and Information Board

(August 2007)

This site closed in March 2021 and is now a read-only archive
JR
jrothwell97
The BBC: A cauldron of hate for Margaret Thatcher?

The Daily bloody Mail posted:
Why does the BBC hate Margaret Thatcher so?

The questions might seem ridiculously naive.

Of course, the BBC hates Lady Thatcher because many of its senior employees are unreconstructed lefties who loathe everything they think she stands for.


(I hate to point it out but the spelling of the word is naïve.)

And another example of the DM bashing the BBC for no readily apparent reason

Daily Mail posted:
A Blue Peter presenter has sparked fury by sharing a "Tory-bashing" platform with London Mayor Ken Livingstone.

The BBC was forced to issue yet another apology after Konnie Huq attended the launch of a campaign hosted by Mr Livingstone, who is accused of using the event to "rant" against his opponents.

Miss Huq's presence has been seen by critics as an inappropriate display of impartiality and support for the Labour politician.

After an official complaint from furious Tories the BBC was forced to issue a humiliating apology - and then insisted the corporation was not to blame.

Instead they claimed Miss Huq, 31, defied executives who ruled her attendance - for which she is understood to have been paid around £1,000 - would be inappropriate.
TV
tvarksouthwest
The one thing that does grate me about the Daily Mail is its amount of BBC-bashing, much of it unfair. DM readers would probably miss the BBC the most if it wasn't around.

That's not to say they don't occasionally have a valid point. Why does the BBC hate Margaret Thatcher? I would have thought that was obvious. Her government tried to control the corporation several times, be that sending in her yes-men as senior BBC executives (though her choice of Stuart Young rebounded on her as he put the BBC's interests first) or "persuading" the Beeb to pull documentaries that could have caused her administration serious embarrassment such as Real Lives (leading to the cross-media NUJ strike in 1985).

I just hope that if the BBC hates Thatcher so much it also has the same amount of hate for Blair, whose Hutton whitewash damaged the corporation in a manner Maggie was never able to achieve.
:-(
A former member
I thourgh Thatcher Hated ITV more Thames really for the documentary/
TV
tvarksouthwest
The difference there was that unlike the BBC, Thames and the IBA refused to bow to the government's request to pull Death On The Rock. As expected, it caused massive embarrassment for her administration. The result - in a gross abuse of power, Thatcher really went out of her way to punish the commercial television industry, the result being the 1990 Broadcasting Act, whose sole aim was to dispose of the ITV contractor which had caused her so much embarrassment.

And if you're in any doubt that Death On The Rock didn't influence the 1990 act, just a year earlier Thatcher had praised British TV as being the best in the world. An audio clip of her speech is available on MHP.

(...waits for the "it wasn't Death On The Rock what did it" brigade to show themselves...)
:-(
A former member
so How did TVAM get the boot?

that Make NO since! TVAM kill the unions!
TG
TG
Allegedly, didn't Maggie write to Bruce Gyngell, expressing her regret that the Act she'd pushed so hard for, also killed TVam?
TV
tvarksouthwest
The 1990 Broadcasting Act was an ideal opportunity for the Tories to kill two birds with one stone - namely getting rid of Thames, and introducing free market ideologies to ITV, the latter would always have happened sooner or later.

TV-am losing its franchise was karma - what goes around comes around! Thatcher clearly never intended for her buddy Gyngell to lose his franchise (his union-bashing, free market ideals had helped shape Government broadcasting policy) but one would have been very surprised if Thames managed to hold on to its franchise. The whole system was obviously rigged to give Thames a disadvantage from the start; maybe even the ITC was under orders not to give Thames a franchise under any circumstances. Who knows? The Freedom of Information Act may one day reveal the truth...

That Carlton, of all Thames' rivals for the London franchise, won it just adds weight to the conspiracy theory. Carlton had, of course, unsuccessfully tried to take over Thames several years earlier.
:-(
A former member
The union need to brought into line ( wow I never thourgh I would say that! )

There just causing chaos, half the time on ITV
TV
tvarksouthwest
Although a strong union presence today may have severely hindered the move towards a single ITV. That could hardly have been a bad thing.
:-(
A former member
Your right But , some of the rule were becoming a joke like a only one person could touch that switch: if you thourgh Health and safety was bad back then with them it was out of this world!

This Goes Very well into here: BBC and Blue peter: Its all about bike but one some one has monad at the bbc for help surprise it old blue

More Here: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/6947857.stm

Quote:
The BBC has warned Blue Peter presenter Konnie Huq about political bias after she took part in a press conference with London mayor Ken Livingstone.

She appeared at an event to promote cycling despite the corporation telling her agent she should not take part.

Conservative London Assembly member Brian Coleman said the Labour mayor had turned the event into a "political rant", breaking BBC impartiality rules.

But Ms Huq's agent, Jonathan Shalit, said she had attended "with goodwill".
TV
tvarksouthwest
623058 posted:
Your right But , some of the rule were becoming a joke like a only one person could touch that switch: if you thourgh Health and safety was bad back then with them it was out of this world!

Admittedly there was this other end of the extreme. But it seems they did genuinely care about television and, through protecting their own members' interests, they indirectly protected many of the viewers' interests (ie. cuts to regional output).

Quote:
This Goes Very well into here: BBC and Blue peter: Its all about bike but one some one has monad at the bbc for help surprise it old blue

More Here: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/6947857.stm

Konnie Huq is entitled to whatever political allegience she chooses, just like any other citizen. While I can accept that this may cause problems with her Blue Peter role, I think most people would realise she wasn't there in a political capacity.

Similarly, Greg Dyke should not have had to cut his personal ties with Labour when he became BBC DG. He has a vote the same as everyone else and only a few red-top hacks would read anything more in to it.
JR
jrothwell97
BBC apologises for 'ridiculing' Redwood

The Daily Mail posted:
The BBC apologised to senior Tory John Redwood last night for screening a 14-year-old film clip of him struggling to sing the Welsh national anthem.

The footage was used to accompany coverage of his announcement of Tory plans to slash red tape, to which it bore no relevance.

Faced with accusations of anti-Tory bias and gratuitously trying to make the former Cabinet minister look foolish, the corporation's director of news Helen Boaden admitted it was "wrong" to use the clip.

As head of the Conservative Party's economic competitiveness policy group, Mr Redwood announced at the weekend a raft of proposals to cut bureaucracy for businesses by £14billion.

A string of BBC bulletins illustrated the story with images of a notorious gaffe he made shortly after becoming Welsh Secretary in 1993.

The film showed a public event where Mr Redwood tried - and failed - to sing the Welsh national anthem.

The camera focused on him miming badly and making it obvious he did not know the words.

Following a string of complaints from furious Tory activists, Miss Boaden conceded the corporation was wrong to dig out the clip.

"In retrospect we weren't right to use the footage again, which came from a long time ago," she said.

She rejected criticism that the corporation had focused too strongly on Labour rebuttals of Mr Redwood's tax-cutting plans.

"There can be a temptation sometimes to present stories as merely matters of party politics, but we believe that we gave good consideration to the substance of the proposals," she said.

Mr Redwood, who will today unveil plans to introduce road-charging for lorries to fund £10billion of highway improvements, said he was "very pleased" with the climbdown.

"The intention was to ridicule me and the policy by the use of outdated and irrelevant film.

"I hope the BBC does not do it again. Nobody else gets that kind of treatment.

"It was intended to prejudice people's responses against very sensible proposals."

The charging plan for heavy goods vehicles, drafted by the same economic competitiveness group under Mr Redwood, will be formally unveiled today.

It will recommend that hauliers are charged for every mile they drive.

Money clawed in will make up a £10billion fund to pay for road improvement schemes, including flyovers in cities and traffic sensors, to keep vehicles moving and reduce gridlock.

But British hauliers would be compensated because the duty on diesel would be reduced dramatically.

This, say the Tories, would iron out the "competitive disadvantage" British truckers face because hauliers in Europe currently pay only half as much for their diesel.


Perfectly within their right to use the clip IMO.

But... inevitably...

Tony from Cheltenham posted:
Yeah! I believe you, BBC. Thousands wouldn't but then, I am naive. It is a pity I have to pay a licence fee even though I vary rarely watch BBC because of not just its left-wing bias but also its Celtic bias.


Next week we should run an anti-license-fee comments counter, taking samples from the Independent and the Daily Mail , and see what the difference is.

Newer posts