TV Home Forum

On what criterion should newsreaders be selected ?

(September 2003)

This site closed in March 2021 and is now a read-only archive
:-(
A former member
what makes a good news reader...?
anyone who can read an autocue is a good start
after that.............
its the famous 'f' factor ....are the girls visually pleasing, cute with swishy hair or pouting lips? - are the blokes smooth and debonair , with passable good looks?
do they have 'it' - that something that makes them connect through the lens and not just seem like some wooden automaton?
are the older ones reassuringly avuncular . Do the double acts give that feelng of older experienced man with winsome young second wife?
...isn't a miracle Anna Ford still does it at all ?
Wink
:-(
A former member
catlitter posted:
are the blokes smooth and debonair , with passable good looks?
Wink


Debonair is a somewhat overused phrase nowadays. Classic debonair is the likes of Nigel Havers etc. A smooth voice, very charming and good looks.

You don't get many newsreaders like that. Trevor McDonald, debonair? I think not.
NS
NickyS Founding member
I'm sorry I have to jump to Katie Derham's defence ... she was a journalist in the BBC's Business and Economics Unit before she got her TV break on Film 99 and then on to ITV. I wouldn't call her lightweight.
The majority of TV news readers are also journalists these days ... can only think of Moira in the BBC who didn't start as a journalist however Moira's many years of reading the news probably means she is as qualified as some others these days.
MS
mike stand
Baroness Trumpington posted:
Hymagumba posted:
I think noone should be chosen as a newsreader if they have a compulsive disorder that makes them knit while talking.
What nonsense! Multi skilling is the way forward. Besides, I knitted a lovely sock for my new baby, while reading the late night news opt and pedalling the autocue. Presenters today? Don't know they're born!


Baroness, never a truer work said!!
On a serious note, I know many jounalists who are brialliant at there trade out in the field, stick them in a studio and they look like frightened rabbits in the headlights when attempting to read the autocue, likewise many good presenters who are no good at reporting.
Multi skilling IS the only way forward. I heard of one newsreader at Granada who painted his own portrait whilst reading the news, pedalling the prompt and directing...all at the same time.
RA
Rangdo
Corin posted:
Turnbull & Williams posted:
And how could a CGI presenter deal with breaking stories and live interviews?


In the TV of tomorrow there will be no live TV, except under very exceptional circumstances.

Just think of how little live tv there is today and how much there was say in the 60s or 70s.

Even some portions of news programmes have been recorded for some time.



Goodness me, you don't half talk a complete load of old b0ll0cks.
:-(
A former member
Lightweight? If you think looks don't matter - think again!.
Pamela Armstrong, Sue Carpenter, Angela Rippon , Carol Barnes ,Julia Somerville , Fiona Armstrong ...and many many more ...all pensioned off when they reached a 'certain age' -( this despite Ms Barnes' alleged face lift to try and stave off the wrinkles....)
John Suchet, Nicholas Owen, Dermot Murnaghan, ...all big in the 'debonair' charm dept...grey hair a positive asset !
Stephen Cole - pretty boy hired as much to charm the ladies as his ability to impart the news! !
It doesn't matter how good you are at writing the story - if you can't read the autocue and look crap then you don't get on the telly . Simple as that.
:-(
A former member
...and , dear Major.....by all accounts ...Big Trev is debonair personified! a real charmer wth the ladies!
TW
Turnbull and Williams
catlitter posted:

It doesn't matter how good you are at writing the story - if you can't read the autocue and look crap then you don't get on the telly . Simple as that.


I'm sure if you think hard enough you'll find a few very good newscasters lacking in the looks department.
AS
Aston
Rangdo posted:
Corin posted:
Turnbull & Williams posted:
And how could a CGI presenter deal with breaking stories and live interviews?


In the TV of tomorrow there will be no live TV, except under very exceptional circumstances.

Just think of how little live tv there is today and how much there was say in the 60s or 70s.

Even some portions of news programmes have been recorded for some time.



Goodness me, you don't half talk a complete load of old b0ll0cks.


Thanks - I was about to say that too! There's actually been a recent trend to do more live, studio based programming - think Terry & Gabby, Wright Stuff, that Melinda Messenger show on Living and of course Xchange to mane but a few...

Trust me, live TV is by no means a dead horse...
MI
Mikeroberts
Lord Wellington posted:
I'd like to hear what others think about facial hair. I'm not talking about eyebrows, but beards and other such nasties. I find facial hair on newsreaders most distracting, and can't help but think it conceals a hideous rash.

You'll note that the BBC must think pretty much along the same lines, as very few prime time newsreaders have facial hair.


Jeremy is the only recent one i can think of on any BBC News

Newer posts