Ministry of Mayhem: 391,310
Dick and Dom in da Bungalow: 402,240
Don't know where you got those from but they're wrong. Most likely only digital figures, but the true ratings were 1,147,000 for dick and dom and 809,000 for mom (the d&d figures include those watching on cbbc, but they're still viewers and are therefore included).
Ministry of Mayhem: 391,310
Dick and Dom in da Bungalow: 402,240
Don't know where you got those from but they're wrong. Most likely only digital figures, but the true ratings were 1,147,000 for dick and dom and 809,000 for mom (the d&d figures include those watching on cbbc, but they're still viewers and are therefore included).
And I do still think ITV sould bring SM:TV back if they just cannot get MoM to work. It's still the best format since Tiswas.
Why bring back a dead horse?
Err maybe because it was the best thing ever to happen to ITV on Saturday Mornings?! Just a hunch...
Yes at the time, but by 2003 it really was at the end, the original presenters left, Brian and Tess were appearing less often on the programme, it got less funnier IMO, perhaps the audience just moved on.
Now I know that less than 400,000 isn't brilliant, but it isn't far behind Dick and Dom, but that isn't too bad, as alot of kids do have access to Digital TV and that's where plenty of the audience is going, plus don't forget T4 and Milkshake/NGA on Five might have had something to do with it. Plus I don't think that MOM costs much to make, most of it is just spent on stuff like cakes, in a Tiswas style, I'd also guess that the presenters fees won't cost much and they hardly have anyone A-list on the show.
SO no one really knows the ratings?
The two cobined should never make up for one programme, as they are different channels. That's like adding up BBC1's and ITV1's ratings together for a World Cup final.
I watched all of MoM, and many parts of D&D, and both were great shows on Saturday.
HIghlights of MoM include the Drake & Josh with the two kids, the Doctor as always, their 'too grown up' sketch, or whatever it was called, and Butthaven.
It was a very strong show on Saturday Morning, the only thing that would make it better is if they acknowledged that viewers were there with a phone in game of some kind!
D&D was also great, where my favourite part was the baby racing, just having babies crawling acorss a course from their mum's to either their dads or another relative, well that was the intention!
The two cobined should never make up for one programme, as they are different channels. That's like adding up BBC1's and ITV1's ratings together for a World Cup final.
Actually, it's NOTHING like combining the ratings for the World Cup final for the perfectly obvious reasons that they aren't the same show. They may show the same pictures for the actual game, but the commentators are different and the studio feeds are different as are the presenters.
Whereas if BBC & ITV were showing the US feed of the Superbowl at the exact same time then you could absolultely combine the viewers and say how many people were watching the programme.
Therefore if the Bungalow is showing on two channels AT THE SAME TIME then you absolutely CAN combine the figures.
I kind of undestand what you mean but your logic Mr Fanoftv is flawed.
The two cobined should never make up for one programme, as they are different channels. That's like adding up BBC1's and ITV1's ratings together for a World Cup final.
Actually, it's NOTHING like combining the ratings for the World Cup final for the perfectly obvious reasons that they aren't the same show. They may show the same pictures for the actual game, but the commentators are different and the studio feeds are different as are the presenters.
Whereas if BBC & ITV were showing the US feed of the Superbowl at the exact same time then you could absolultely combine the viewers and say how many people were watching the programme.
Therefore if the Bungalow is showing on two channels AT THE SAME TIME then you absolutely CAN combine the figures.
I kind of undestand what you mean but your logic Mr Fanoftv is flawed.
