IS
Maybe, but I'd have thought that such a warning would be reserved for things that absolutely mustn't be used. That said, why would they not just delete the record if that was the case?
Is it not just the case the "Do not use" instruction is due to the fact it was later released on video and therefore the other copy is of a better, remastered quality?
Maybe, but I'd have thought that such a warning would be reserved for things that absolutely mustn't be used. That said, why would they not just delete the record if that was the case?