TV Home Forum

Channel 4 to invest in kids output

(March 2008)

This site closed in March 2021 and is now a read-only archive
BE
benjy
Interesting development reported on Broadcastnow.

http://www.broadcastnow.co.uk/news/2008/03/c4_to_pump_10m_into_kids_output.html
(registration required)

Here are the main points...

broadcastnow.co.uk posted:
Channel 4 has ring-fenced £10m to spend on programmes for 10-to 15 year-olds over the next two years - with a flagship drama series set to take centre stage.

C4 wants a pre-watershed drama for the age group for the second half of 2009. The aim is to combine the cultural impact of the BBC's Grange Hill in its heyday with the slick, multi-media approach of C4's older-skewing Hollyoaks and Skins.

"Grange Hill had a fantastic connection to this age group," said C4 director of television and content Kevin Lygo. "If we could achieve what it did - that sense of engagement - and create a great level of involvement using digital media, that would be a big win."

Lygo said he was looking for an aspirational contemporary drama that would not preach to its audience and would make a lot of noise at its launch. It would run across E4 and Channel 4, most likely in a weekend slot, as well as online.

Although drama is C4's initial focus, Lygo said the broadcaster was looking for ideas with PSB credentials from any genre.

"My inclination is to do one or two big things rather than 20 little ones," he said. However, he emphasised: "We're not looking for the new Blue Peter."

C4's move into children's TV follows ITV scaling back its kids output. "This is not a particularly commercially viable thing to do and commercial broadcasters have cut back [in this area]," said Lygo. "You're unlikely to attract a vast audience. It's a departure for us, born out of a belief in what Ofcom and others have identified as a group that's not particularly well served by television."


Interesting stuff, Channel 4 have spotted a gap in the market that they are pretty well equipped to fill, now that CBBC is aiming at a younger audience. Not to mention strengthening their public service value...
JO
Joe
Sounds great. Channel 4 really seem to do drama well, and if they're aiming things at the right audience which I don't feel is currently well catered for, then that can only be a good thing.
MS
Mr-Stabby
It's certainly a good idea. There was a great quote by Christopher Eccleston which basically summed up my feelings on kids tv, it went something along the lines of "If you give them good stuff early on in life, they're going to demand good stuff when they grow up"

It basically means two things. If you give them good drama when they're kids they'll expect it when they grow up, and so hopefully companies won't be able to push out the same cheap reality crap because the new audience will expect more. It also means that kids won't be completely disinterested in TV when they are kids, and therefore not completely disinterested in it when they grow up when channels ARE trying to cater for them. If you sew the idea of television into a childs mind, they'll watch it when they grow up. If there's nothing for them to watch now, they probably won't bother with a TV when they grow up. By making kids TV, TV companies are in a way securing their future.
BR
Brekkie
Mixed views on this - C4 basically exist to fulfil the PSB elements not fulfilled by the BBC and ITV, and though increasingly so children's TV is part of that, it shouldn't be.

I don't want to see C4 become a dumping ground for all of ITV's PSB responsibilities.


What is planned though is probably on the right scale - one or two big series a year, with the focus probably more online than on TV. Teens and 16-24 though should definately remain C4's priority - even with all the cuts to kids TV teens are still very badly served in comparison.


Another thing of interest (to me anyway) in the "Next on 4" report today were the plans for "4Sport", bringing together 14 Olympic sports which don't get much coverage under the 4Sport banner online. This really is more "C4" IMO - fulfilling a PSB requirement, but not a maintstream PSB area.
:-(
A former member
well this all be going into the T4 branding?
BR
Brekkie
They'll probably sacrifice a Friends repeat on a Saturday morning for it, or perhaps put it on before Hollyoaks on a Sunday.
CW
Charlie Wells Moderator
If the children's programming on Channel 4 is successful then it might just kick rival channels (notably ITV) into copying the idea and investing more in children's programming.
IS
Inspector Sands
Charlie Wells posted:
If the children's programming on Channel 4 is successful then it might just kick rival channels (notably ITV) into copying the idea and investing more in children's programming.


I can't really see that happening unless they can get the junk food adverts back, even then kids programmes will still be minority programming. The nearer Digital switchover gets the less likely ITV are to do minority programming
NE
Netizen
A cynic (not me) might suggest that this is a way of making C4 appear more deserving of a slice of the licence fee pie? Or whatever new PSB funding scheme is invented in the near future.
BR
Brekkie
Netizen posted:
A cynic (not me) might suggest that this is a way of making C4 appear more deserving of a slice of the licence fee pie? Or whatever new PSB funding scheme is invented in the near future.


I don't think C4 have made it any secret that's what they're after.
:-(
A former member
I don't think that is particularly a problem anyway.

If ITV had been granted a share of the licence fee, they would have been locked into their PSB requirements.

The more channels locked in in this way the better IMO.
BR
Brekkie
With ITV at least surely their licence to broadcast should be enough to lock them into their PSB commitments.


I'm not sure about this "top-slicing" of the licence fee really - where do you draw the line?


The idea of C4 has always been to put commercial profits back into the station to help fund PSB programming, and ideally that is how it should remain - but evidently if profits fall, that PSB programming comes under risk - though I'm still to be convinced by C4's argument myself.

Newer posts