If you haven't got proof of the above then I'd suggest that a moderator remove it for legal reasons. If you have, provide a link to a report of the coronor's verdict so that those interested can read it and remove the text above for those who do not wish to. Even if it's all fact the detail is unnecessarily graphic.
I think marksi is right and I have been as guilty of it as others on here. We are going into potentially libellous territory and think we should try and focus on the programme itself rather than past deeds of the occupants.
Did anyone see Big Brother: The Celebrity Years on E4 over the last few days?
Apparently Jack Dee (CBB1) and Les Dennis (CBB2) wouldn't allow any footage of them to be shown a second time around. So the producers were faced with the task of editing together the best bits from these 3 series without showing any images of Dee or Dennis - a very tricky job, especially as Dee was the winner of CBB1.
I thought whenever someone entered the Big Brother House they signed some kind of contract giving Endemol / Channel Four the permanent ownership of all footage taken of them inside the house. But obviously that's not the case with some of the celebrity contestants - they have something up their sleeves to prevent footage being shown again without their permission.
I'm watching the repeat of this on C4 now. How pathetic of Jack Dee and Les Dennis!
Funny actually. I seem to remember a show called "What ever happened to Saturday Night TV" on C4 where Les Dennis was actually interviewed about his time in the house, and they showed various clips. I wonder why he's so bothered about it now.
I do think rdobbie's post should be removed for legal reasons.
