TV Home Forum

Buying an old TV trademark

(November 2015)

This site closed in March 2021 and is now a read-only archive
IN
Interceptor
Going back to the original point, there are countless examples outside of the media world of an unrelated business taking on a brand name recognised as originally belonging to another business within the same sector, and being able to do that because the original trademark has lapsed either by registration, by lack of active use, or both. Going back again to train companies, First Great Western has just rebranded as GWR, irrespective of the fact that First Group has absolutely no connection with the original GWR.
They haven't then suggested that the original GWR have in some way infringed upon their trademark though, have they? What First have trademarked is the (First) GWR logo, nothing else. Anybody is free to use the GWR name given that it has long lapsed (if it was ever registered to start with!). Any attempt to enforce such a trademark would probably result in its registration being thrown out.

Similarly, given that ITV plc have abandoned all of the brand names that the original regional stations used to trade under (with some not even getting continued acknowledgement in regional news titles), they cannot have it both ways and also prevent anyone else from ever re-using those names if they allow any trademark registrations that might still exist to lapse when they are no longer actively using the trademarks. Media is not an industry with separate rules.

ITV aren't trying to have it both ways. You either care about a trademark, and renew it, or you don't. It's that simple. Those trademarks are "dead", meaning they're effectively free for anybody else to use - but not register.
MA
Markymark
Going back to the original point, there are countless examples outside of the media world of an unrelated business taking on a brand name recognised as originally belonging to another business within the same sector, and being able to do that because the original trademark has lapsed either by registration, by lack of active use, or both. Going back again to train companies, First Great Western has just rebranded as GWR, irrespective of the fact that First Group has absolutely no connection with the original GWR.
They haven't then suggested that the original GWR have in some way infringed upon their trademark though, have they? What First have trademarked is the (First) GWR logo, nothing else. Anybody is free to use the GWR name given that it has long lapsed (if it was ever registered to start with!). Any attempt to enforce such a trademark would probably result in its registration being thrown out.


The GWR name was adopted by the merged radio companies Radio West and Wiltshire Radio in the 1980s, and survived until a further merger with Captial Radio when the name GCap was adopted, (though GWR was still used in on air branding in Bristol and Wiltshire until about 5 years ago). There, almost back on topic.
IS
Inspector Sands
Staying with radio, there was a trademark battle with the name LBC back in the 90's. The name LBC wasn't being used by the new owners of the original LBC who took it over after winning it's license. Mohammad Al Fayed then bought a station in London called Viva and wanted to rename it the Liberty Broadcasting Company or LBC on air. However Al Fayed wasn't allowed to so had to use the name Liberty Radio instead. The LBC name returned a few years later to the original station.

It's happened again more recently. The BBC weren't able to call their London station 'BBC Radio London' until recently because of the other Radio London
JA
james-2001
So that's the reason for the ridiculous BBC LDN branding?
LL
London Lite Founding member
So that's the reason for the ridiculous BBC LDN branding?


LDN was a tri-media brand, promoting the regional news, local radio and online outlets. The BBC's plan was to have a singular brand across of the regional platforms in London. They did want London Live as the name for all outlets initally, but went with LDN visually only, while London Live was used for radio.
IS
Inspector Sands
So that's the reason for the ridiculous BBC LDN branding?


No connection, the station had been called GLR since the late 80's and then was 'London Live' before the BBC LDN/BBC London branding.

LDN was a tri-media brand, promoting the regional news, local radio and online outlets. The BBC's plan was to have a singular brand across of the regional platforms in London. They did want London Live as the name for all outlets initally, but went with LDN visually only, while London Live was used for radio.

Not quite. When BBC London/LDN was launched, the London Live name was dropped completely.

Though yes, the TV programme was going to be called 'London Live' too, in fact there was a set of titles made for it when the other regional news titles of the time were produced - they were on YouTube once.

Oddly, the head of BBC London at the time went on to be programme director of the TV channel London Live some years later. 'London Live' was also the original name for 'L!ve TV'
IS
Isonstine Founding member
Does anyone remember Real Player? The "London Live" titles available here.
NG
noggin Founding member
Does anyone remember Real Player? The "London Live" titles available here.


Were those ever used on-screen on BBC One?

I have a recollection that BBC London's studio operation started at Marylebone High Street but continued with multicoloured Newsroom South East titles and on-screen look that was in use previously at Elstree (though they dropped to single headed presentation) recreated in a CSO set. I think BBC South East at Tunbridge Wells had split by this point?

When BBC London launched for real (possibly the same time that the BBC Oxford sub-opt started - not sure) with Emily Maitlis at Marylebone High Street the BBC LDN brand was used - and was all red?
IS
Isonstine Founding member
A rare moment of brain fade for you noggin... Smile (Happened across this by accident.)

noggin on 8 August 2001 posted:
Newsroom South East has moved to the new BBC London HQ at Marylebone High Street. This has been the home to London Live radio for quite a while. Marylebone is also the home to parts of TV Training (there is a separate TV training studio and gallery there) as well as journalist training.

I am not sure anyone could really describe Elstree as part of London at all - it's definitely in Hertfordshire! (Borehamwood)

Currently Newsroom South East from Marylebone High Street is being broadcast across the old BBC South East region (minus Oxford who peeled off to be a Southampton sub-opt a while back)

Next month Tunbridge Wells should launch 'South East Today' the new BBC South East region covering Kent and parts of East Sussex, then Marylebone High St will be broadcasting to the new BBC London region only.

There is some speculation that the BBC London programme may then cease to be called Newsroom South East (possibly London Live to match the radio station) and may change look and feel quite a bit.


Full discussion here http://tvforum.uk/tvhome/newsroom-south-east-36207/

It seemed a simpler time, back then!
PE
peteprodge
You may wish to consider 'ATV Network Limited', which was acquired by Mike Garrett of the Crossroads Appreciation Society some years back. Initially used to promote amateur dramatics at a theatre, the company is also used to run Mike's 'ATV Today' website - which is basically an attempt at trying to be Digital Spy.

This new ATV Network Limited is not allowed to use the double-eye ident that the proper ATV of old used. The new ATV Network Limited have instead trademarked a logo. They've used the three spotlights thing from the start of the Zoom 2 ident, but because they can't directly copy it (it's prior art from the old ATV), they have had to slightly squash them so they're not proper circles.

However, this didn't stop Mike Garrett from launching an extremely ill-advised and deceptive attempt at warning off ATVLand.productions (producers of documentaries From ATVLand In Colour and From Headlines To Tight Lines, which document the days of ATV and Central). Mike had written a quasi-legal threat to ATVLand.productions one Boxing Day, warning of dire consequences for using the ATV (double eye) logo.

Rather pleasingly, Keith Jacobsen (who at one time owned the name and trademark rights to TVS) looked into it and exposed Mike Garrett's threat as completely deceptive, legally unenforceable and had it ripped to pieces on the ATVLand.net forum.

As a result, Mike had to deal with a lot of anger from other folk in the Crossroads Appreciation Society, having embarrassed the organisation with a daft petty feud.
SP
Steve in Pudsey
It's happened again more recently. The BBC weren't able to call their London station 'BBC Radio London' until recently because of the other Radio London


See also: BBC Essex, BBC Tees
MA
Markymark
It's happened again more recently. The BBC weren't able to call their London station 'BBC Radio London' until recently because of the other Radio London


See also: BBC Essex, BBC Tees


Yep, and BBC Wiltshire Sound, (though they also used the name BBC Somerset Sound when there was no confusion (matching ILR was Orchard FM)

BBC South got in a strop in 1981, just before TVS took over from Southern.
Television South hadn't (I don't think) announced that their on-air brand name was going
to be 'TVS'. The Beeb got upset putting out local press statements that the viewers would
get confused between (BBC) TV South, and Television South, and there were even regional
promos for South Today, with the tag line 'Beware of Imitations'

The local press weren't terribly impressed, and I remember an editorial in my local paper,
stating the BBC should 'grow up' and not insult the intelligence of its audience.

Newer posts