GS
Fair enough, so what's your verdict on everything else I suggested for RND 2009 other than my three Boogie Beebies specials, e.g. more music than they had, stand-up comics, etc?
Well I'll be honest I couldn't get through it, so I have little to add.
You do rather make a rod for your own back. There may be some salient idea or opinion in there, but its drowning in unnecessary waffle.
To try and give you a helpful example - when someone mentioned Colour of Money, you went on to explain to us what you'd learned from a Wiki search - well, no one asked for the potted history.
It would be quite enough for you to make the point that Chris Tarrant shows are, you think, usually successful - someone will counter that they're not, and so on. When you post its like reading a Ladybird Retrospecticus of the Bleeding Obvious, so I tend not to bother.
Do you know what I mean?
Could you perhaps try to adapt a little to the usual forum conventions?
Gavin Scott
Founding member
Saying it a third time is completely superfluous. You're not talking to children.
Now for heaven's sake - if you can't take negative feedback on your idea then you might consider keeping a diary instead.
Which, in essence, is how you tend to write.
Now for heaven's sake - if you can't take negative feedback on your idea then you might consider keeping a diary instead.
Which, in essence, is how you tend to write.
Fair enough, so what's your verdict on everything else I suggested for RND 2009 other than my three Boogie Beebies specials, e.g. more music than they had, stand-up comics, etc?
Well I'll be honest I couldn't get through it, so I have little to add.
You do rather make a rod for your own back. There may be some salient idea or opinion in there, but its drowning in unnecessary waffle.
To try and give you a helpful example - when someone mentioned Colour of Money, you went on to explain to us what you'd learned from a Wiki search - well, no one asked for the potted history.
It would be quite enough for you to make the point that Chris Tarrant shows are, you think, usually successful - someone will counter that they're not, and so on. When you post its like reading a Ladybird Retrospecticus of the Bleeding Obvious, so I tend not to bother.
Do you know what I mean?
Could you perhaps try to adapt a little to the usual forum conventions?