James Martin:
"There must be loads of people who've wan ked in the house, you just can't go that long without doing it, surely?"
They've not been as obvious as Ray
Contestants in previous series have admitted to masturbating in the shower or in bed, but they observed that any action under the covers caused the camera to start zooming in.
James Martin:
"There must be loads of people who've wan ked in the house, you just can't go that long without doing it, surely?"
They've not been as obvious as Ray
Contestants in previous series have admitted to masturbating in the shower or in bed, but they observed that any action under the covers caused the camera to start zooming in.
The irony is if Ray hadn't tried to disguise his actions with the duvet it would never have been shown.
PS. I think it's time we got a late night edition of BBLB once a week to discuss some of the more adult aspects of Big Brother.
Cam will certainly go - he's beginning to creep me out.
I also think Jon's time is running out, but unfortunately it's likely to be Fed (the only housemate with a complex personality - so complex he doesn't understand it) will go. Keep Fed in - he'll go mad eventually!!!!
TO EVICT CAMERON - 09011 21 44 02 (text VOTE CAMERON to 85444)
TO EVICT FED - 09011 21 44 03 (text VOTE FEDERICO to 85444)
TO EVICT JON - 09011 21 44 05 then press redial, then press redial, then press redial... (text VOTE JON to 85444)
"Instead of two or more people with the most nominations being put to the public vote, Big Brother will be putting the THREE OR MORE housemates with the most nominations to the public vote,"
Right, I'm sorry to be picky, but that is really badly explained.
I appreciate that two people will be leaving no matter what, but using the "or more" suffix really clouds the issue.
All they are doing is raising the minimum number of people that can be up for eviction. Why did they not just say that? Seems a bit of a contrary way of trying to explain things.
Personally I think it's another one of those things that's likely to spoil the game. They must be putting someone else in or at the very least missing a week of nominations (though Channel 4 would surely not choose to miss out on the ratings boosts they bring).
They already have caused the eviction of the most entertaining character on the first night because of meddling with the format, their rich/poor divide last year was a complete shambles and this year they can't help but mess with something else.
Just let them get on with it, rather than fiddling. The best series of BB was the first because A) you didn't know what to expect and B) they didn't bother with all of the **** gimmicks.
I think Federico and Cameron will go this week. Whatever happens as least it will even it out a bit more - ie 3 girls and 4 boys will be in the house on Saturday.
c@t - If no new housemates are added it'll leave 3 in the last week (as series 1), which I personally believe is enough. Last year's final with 4 housemates was a bit too much - it is better to have 3 on the final week.
Another idea is to send in THREE new housemates. Evictions would then continue as usual, leaving six in the final week.
Then from the final Monday, the housemate with the lowest number of votes would be evicted, leaving just 2 in the house on the final day.
corse people have wan ked in the BB House, I could not go 64 days without, maybe 5 max
What even if there is 5 million or so viewers watching you
I dont think i'd care, has he gotten any bad press due to it? I rekon it will become a memorable moment, and will certainly boost his popularity when he leaves the house.