SP
I thought that doing things that have a limited audience because they would be unsustainable commercially was the main justification for the license fee?
Matrix posted:
Umm, Indeed a shame, But I suppose it it has such a limited "following" then why waste the ever so valuable license fee on it.
Its all Supply and Demand as, well, Sir Sugar would say...
Its all Supply and Demand as, well, Sir Sugar would say...
I thought that doing things that have a limited audience because they would be unsustainable commercially was the main justification for the license fee?
CY
I wasn't wittering at you, Mr Nokky.
I was wittering at that prat, Mr Cyclone, who could have deleted the first post in the thread and thus the thread itself.
When I was writing I got a message saying that it was in the wrong forum, then when I tried to delete the post it wouldn't let me, then somebody moved it to the other forum. It was being moved all over the place by someone else and to be honest I didn't know what was going on.
Nick Harvey posted:
nok32uk posted:
I didn't care this was in the wrong forum.
I wasn't wittering at you, Mr Nokky.
I was wittering at that prat, Mr Cyclone, who could have deleted the first post in the thread and thus the thread itself.
When I was writing I got a message saying that it was in the wrong forum, then when I tried to delete the post it wouldn't let me, then somebody moved it to the other forum. It was being moved all over the place by someone else and to be honest I didn't know what was going on.
GE
thegeek
Founding member
This was actually coming for quite some time..
http://media.guardian.co.uk/site/story/0,14173,1377230,00.html?gusrc=rss
http://media.guardian.co.uk/site/story/0,14173,1377230,00.html?gusrc=rss