TV Home Forum

BBC Two: new idents from Sunday 18 February

See page 42 for images (July 2006)

This site closed in March 2021 and is now a read-only archive
BS
brotherton sands
They're lovely. Smile To me, they look more-or-less like what I'd imagine the "turquoise 2's" might well have gradually evolved into by now anyway, if they had continued beyond 2001.

Therefore, it's effectively as if the (IMHO inferior) yellow and purple CGI idents had never happened. Which is a good thing, IMHO.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
As many are saying, the retention of a "boxed" logo is surprising, given that BBC One has moved away from the "box" Confused

It'll be very inconsistent for three of the BBC's four numbered channels to have box logos, whilst only one doesn't Rolling Eyes

Perhaps the only way to make BBC Two's retention of the "box" seem justifiable, would be for BBC Three & BBC Four to change their respective idents to neither "boxed", nor centralised [ B ][ B ][C ] one style either...

- i.e. if each BBC channel has a totally different way of presenting the logo. After all, this has worked for the "Channel 4" family of channels - each of which has a completely dissimilar style of "4" from each other, of course.

Ironically, such totally diversity across the four numbered BBC channels would actually look more "consistant" (i.e. a "diversity is a type of uniformity" irony) than the current mess of three "boxed" channels versus only one not-"boxed" channel, IMHO Idea Smile
BA
Bail Moderator
Spencer For Hire posted:
Was wondering how long it'd take. From the school of predictable, lazy journalism that brought you, "Are A-Levels getting easier?"...

Sun Article


But it does seem to say there are 14 new idents, not 8 like BBC One...
SP
Spencer
jrothwell97 posted:
I wonder what the Daily Mail is saying?


Probably blaming it on immigration or Political Correctness Gone Mad™.
RE
Reboot
Bail posted:
Spencer For Hire posted:
Was wondering how long it'd take. From the school of predictable, lazy journalism that brought you, "Are A-Levels getting easier?"...

Sun Article


But it does seem to say there are 14 new idents, not 8 like BBC One...

Seven themes, 14 idents = seven "real" idents and seven variants (probably just long/short, although there might be a Bounce Normal/Bounce Sombre-style variant or two or different views through the 2s, I suppose).

And for the benefit of anyone who doesn't know, Mediawatch-UK = Mary Whitehouse's lot. Yes, they're still going....
DD
DarkestDreams
PCGM Laughing

Love the idents but the box is a little odd - it's not really needed, however it looks good in teal and semi-transparent.

roll on Sunday!
BR
Brekkie
Reboot posted:
And for the benefit of anyone who doesn't know, Mediawatch-UK = Mary Whitehouse's lot. Yes, they're still going....



The ironic thing is when the BBC spend thousands on lavish promos such as the talking heads or the cliffhanger one it's organisations like MediaWatch which get them banned!


Maybe next time they should just resort to filming a piece of paper pinned to a door with "BBC TWO" scrawled across it - and then let's see how they react!
JO
Johnny83
Reboot posted:
Bail posted:
Spencer For Hire posted:
Was wondering how long it'd take. From the school of predictable, lazy journalism that brought you, "Are A-Levels getting easier?"...

Sun Article


But it does seem to say there are 14 new idents, not 8 like BBC One...

Seven themes, 14 idents = seven "real" idents and seven variants (probably just long/short, although there might be a Bounce Normal/Bounce Sombre-style variant or two or different views through the 2s, I suppose).

And for the benefit of anyone who doesn't know, Mediawatch-UK = Mary Whitehouse's lot. Yes, they're still going....


The comments on there are stupid and typical of a Sun reader as well, the Jonathon Ross one makes me laugh, regarding the Queen's English

I don't know why these papers make a big deal out of it, as if their owners don't spend vast amounts of money on what other people would consider a load of rubbish Rolling Eyes
SP
Spencer
Well of course there's the Murdoch factor as well. Something tells me they wouldn't run a story on Sky spending lots of money on new idents whilst regularly hiking up subscriptions.
AN
all new Phil
Spencer For Hire posted:
Well of course there's the Murdoch factor as well. Something tells me they wouldn't run a story on Sky spending lots of money on new idents whilst regularly hiking up subscriptions.

It's not like you're forced to subscribe to Sky, though.
SP
Spencer
all new Phil posted:
Spencer For Hire posted:
Well of course there's the Murdoch factor as well. Something tells me they wouldn't run a story on Sky spending lots of money on new idents whilst regularly hiking up subscriptions.

It's not like you're forced to subscribe to Sky, though.


That's not what they said in Whitehaven. Wink
AN
all new Phil
Spencer For Hire posted:
That's not what they said in Whitehaven. Wink

I have no idea to what you are referring.

Anyway! They look alright, agree with most comments about the box logo, I thought this would have been ditched in favour of something a bit more exciting. I've never been a fan of the dull yellow idents, personally, so this revamp can't come soon enough.
PE
Pete Founding member
all new Phil posted:
Spencer For Hire posted:
That's not what they said in Whitehaven. Wink

I have no idea to what you are referring.


Whitehaven is the first part of the Border region that'll ahve analogue turned off. The Sly marketting plebs essentially tried to use this to con little old ladies into buying sky as they had no other option available.

Newer posts