RD
We all know that old repeats have to go through the "compliance" department nowadays, in the name of modern standards and in order that J. Savile and his ilk are fully airbrushed from history. (Although I was surprised to see Nick Cotton's reference to Pakistanis – using a truncated version of the word – wasn't removed from the very first episode of EastEnders shown on iPlayer recently).
Some edits are harder to understand, though.
I've just been watching the archive game shows on iPlayer (part of the BBC Four Collections series) and noticed that on Bob's Full House and Big Break, present-day changes have been made to the end credits.
BOB'S FULL HOUSE:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/p02mb106/bobs-full-house-series-4-19121987#group=p02nm7g8
(Watch from 34:15)
The credits are far too crisp for 1987, especially when viewed in HD and compared to the rest of the show's graphics, and don't match up with the first and final credit boards that appear on the wide shot of the rotating board (e.g. there's no drop shadow under the text on the wide shot) and the © symbol on the "new" credits is from Windows Arial font – definitely not in service in 1987.
BIG BREAK:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/p02m43pm/big-break-series-13-19052001#group=p02nm7g8
(Watch from 28:00)
A slide has been inserted that says "Format owned by Roger Medcalf" which totally clashes with the style of the original credits. I appreciate there must be a legal reason for this (despite the fact that Medcalf's name appears in the credits anyway) but I'm more intrigued as to why this slide was created in a completely random and stylised font, when the original credits are in Gill Sans - hardly the most difficult font to identify or recreate.
But more importantly, the end credits have been replaced with those from a completely different episode from 1998, when the actual show is from 2001. For heaven's sake, WHY ?
My wider question is why the BBC have developed this growing obsession with messing around with archive shows? Exactly who is watching them pre-broadcast in such forensic detail? A team of media lawyers or media historians? Isn't this all a bit over the top?
Some edits are harder to understand, though.
I've just been watching the archive game shows on iPlayer (part of the BBC Four Collections series) and noticed that on Bob's Full House and Big Break, present-day changes have been made to the end credits.
BOB'S FULL HOUSE:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/p02mb106/bobs-full-house-series-4-19121987#group=p02nm7g8
(Watch from 34:15)
The credits are far too crisp for 1987, especially when viewed in HD and compared to the rest of the show's graphics, and don't match up with the first and final credit boards that appear on the wide shot of the rotating board (e.g. there's no drop shadow under the text on the wide shot) and the © symbol on the "new" credits is from Windows Arial font – definitely not in service in 1987.
BIG BREAK:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/p02m43pm/big-break-series-13-19052001#group=p02nm7g8
(Watch from 28:00)
A slide has been inserted that says "Format owned by Roger Medcalf" which totally clashes with the style of the original credits. I appreciate there must be a legal reason for this (despite the fact that Medcalf's name appears in the credits anyway) but I'm more intrigued as to why this slide was created in a completely random and stylised font, when the original credits are in Gill Sans - hardly the most difficult font to identify or recreate.
But more importantly, the end credits have been replaced with those from a completely different episode from 1998, when the actual show is from 2001. For heaven's sake, WHY ?
My wider question is why the BBC have developed this growing obsession with messing around with archive shows? Exactly who is watching them pre-broadcast in such forensic detail? A team of media lawyers or media historians? Isn't this all a bit over the top?