A prime example of how ITV just forgot about Christmas night programming is seen in 2007, with probably a truly pathetic line up against the BBC.
5.00pm - Film: Polar Express (Premiere)
6.50pm - Emmerdale
7.50pm - ITV News
8.00pm - Harry Hill's Christmas TV Burp
8.30pm - Coronation Street
9.30pm - Film: Love Actually (not a premiere, but a repeat broadcast)
11.55pm - ITV News
Now, I can't be the only one who thought that 2007 line up was truly pathetic?
That's a load of old tosh. Your comments, not the line up.
Yes, Polar Express isn't great but it was the premiere of a notable Christmas film. The soaps are ever present whether you like it or not, TV Burp was massive at the time and although not new Love Actually quickly established itself as a Christmas favourite of the schedulers at least and was still relatively new to TV at the time.
Once again, this is only my opinion. My opinion. That is what a TV Forum is for.
Love Actually, would be a great film, but not for prime time Christmas night, when you would expect something new from ITV, instead a repeat of a film. Channel 4 or 5 would seem fine, but on ITV, no sorry, just laziness.
You are absolutely entitled to your opinions, just like every other TV Forum member... but with the very, *very* greatest of respect, you really should try to express these opinions in a way that will *not* aggravate others and make them reply with things like, "What a load of tosh you're saying."
And that includes trying to use words and terms other than "not bothered", "pathetic" and "just lazy". These particular words and terms *can* be harsh sometimes. Remember, the written word *does* have its drawbacks compared to the spoken word.
All that said, we're *all* guilty sometimes of letting our guard down and saying or typing the wrong words or terms without really thinking. If we were all perfect, life would be boring - and indeed, if all TV Forum members were perfect, TV Forum probably wouldn't be very interesting either.
Last edited by DE88 on 3 December 2018 11:21pm