GR
This is the most vile graphic I have ever seen. Looks like a child has opened Photoshop for the first time.
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3092/3129353672_3d613ba170.jpg
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3092/3129353672_3d613ba170.jpg
DB
The annoying thing it could be made much better, but it looks like a half-arsed attempted.
gregmc posted:
This is the most vile graphic I have ever seen. Looks like a child has opened Photoshop for the first time.
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3092/3129353672_3d613ba170.jpg
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3092/3129353672_3d613ba170.jpg
The annoying thing it could be made much better, but it looks like a half-arsed attempted.
DA
This is a million times better than those awful credit squeeze things they have been using.
Davidjb
Founding member
gregmc posted:
This is the most vile graphic I have ever seen. Looks like a child has opened Photoshop for the first time.
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3092/3129353672_3d613ba170.jpg
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3092/3129353672_3d613ba170.jpg
This is a million times better than those awful credit squeeze things they have been using.
PT
Exactly!! Jeez some people are never happy.
Davidjb posted:
This is a million times better than those awful credit squeeze things they have been using.
Exactly!! Jeez some people are never happy.
RE
I seemed to get the impression from the trailers that the programme's other objective was to bum up Robert Peston. He may well be an excellent journalist, but he sure is immensely irritating and seems to stand out because of his character rather than his journalism.
Chie posted:
I thought Panorama's 'post-crunch' analysis was quite premature. That's the kind of show that crops up a couple years after the event - not a few months into it.
I seemed to get the impression from the trailers that the programme's other objective was to bum up Robert Peston. He may well be an excellent journalist, but he sure is immensely irritating and seems to stand out because of his character rather than his journalism.