BB
Well, indeed - if you do ever find anyone that gives a sh-t about one of your points, please don't hesitate to keep it to yourself.
Why bother replying then? If my points are of, as you suggest, such little worth, follow your own guidance on the matter.
tsunami - your assertion that the Guardian and quality do not go together shows a level of stupidity I have yet to see matched on here. Quite how you are able to come to the conclusion that a newspaper responsible for bringing down the last government through exposure of sleaze allegations, a newspaper that uncovered genocide in Eastern Europe, a newspaper whose Comment pages formed the platform for the SDLP on which to launch, quite how you come to a conclusion that a newspaper like that is not of "quality" is beyond me.
What I find so wonderfully ironic is that these past few years I have been saying what a disastrous mess News 24 is: boring, lifeless, crap at breaking news. For years you have been disagreeing with me, defending it to the hilt. And yet just the other day, the woman in charge of the channel itself comes out and backs up everything I've said.
Remarkable. Truly remarkable.
Dear God, you're boring.
What's remarkable to me is just how much attention you have given this whole issue given how unworthy of attention you so vehemently insist it is. Perhaps you should lead by example and ignore the issue yourself, instead of returning to the debate for no other reasons than to have the last word in the argument and to demand that we all acknowledge your wisdom and supreme judgement.
Well you've been saying News 24 is crap for years, and now the BBC agrees with you. Congratulations, we applaud your incredible foresight, and we're enormously grateful to you for bringing that fact to our attention. Now, why don't you be a good little pussy and stop demanding attention from everyone?
c@t posted:
BBC LDN posted:
c@t posted:
My point - made a number of hours ago - remains: it is a wonder that anyone gives a sh-t.
Well, indeed - if you do ever find anyone that gives a sh-t about one of your points, please don't hesitate to keep it to yourself.
Why bother replying then? If my points are of, as you suggest, such little worth, follow your own guidance on the matter.
tsunami - your assertion that the Guardian and quality do not go together shows a level of stupidity I have yet to see matched on here. Quite how you are able to come to the conclusion that a newspaper responsible for bringing down the last government through exposure of sleaze allegations, a newspaper that uncovered genocide in Eastern Europe, a newspaper whose Comment pages formed the platform for the SDLP on which to launch, quite how you come to a conclusion that a newspaper like that is not of "quality" is beyond me.
What I find so wonderfully ironic is that these past few years I have been saying what a disastrous mess News 24 is: boring, lifeless, crap at breaking news. For years you have been disagreeing with me, defending it to the hilt. And yet just the other day, the woman in charge of the channel itself comes out and backs up everything I've said.
Remarkable. Truly remarkable.
Dear God, you're boring.
What's remarkable to me is just how much attention you have given this whole issue given how unworthy of attention you so vehemently insist it is. Perhaps you should lead by example and ignore the issue yourself, instead of returning to the debate for no other reasons than to have the last word in the argument and to demand that we all acknowledge your wisdom and supreme judgement.
Well you've been saying News 24 is crap for years, and now the BBC agrees with you. Congratulations, we applaud your incredible foresight, and we're enormously grateful to you for bringing that fact to our attention. Now, why don't you be a good little pussy and stop demanding attention from everyone?