MA
Sky Arts appears to have gone free to air and they want to plonk it on Freeview too by the end of the year. The concern may be that if this move attracts larger audiences for Arts then there may be little incentive to have a channel that effectively competes with it for no apparent reason other than to wheel out archive documentaries.
Mind you that being said, Artsworld (as it was originally) only survived because Sky opened their wallet.
Whilst it's great to hear that Sky Arts is going FTA and may come to Freeview, I would be wary of this leading to any long-term BBC policy on the genres of programming that they provide.
This is simply because Sky's business models and strategies may change in the future, and Sky Arts may be taken back behind the pay-wall at a time that suits Sky (or, indeed, may close entirely at some stage - who knows). It is dangerous for the BBC to withdraw from arts programming just because Sky Arts are currently bulking up their output on FTA.
Should there be good BBC Arts and BBC Music programming shown on BBC Two, then I will gladly shut up about this - I'm not speaking out in favour of keeping BBC Four per se. But, as I expressed yesterday, I have deep concerns that the genre of programming that BBC Four excelled in (yes, once the domain of BBC Two, but sadly not in the recent past) remaining if the channel closes.
If Sky Arts ends up on Freeview in the same sub SD sludge that Sky News is broadcast in, then forget it!
"Arts" is a word given to misrepresentation. Yes it means opera, performance and painting but is also means jazz, acting and ceramics. Both BBC 4 and Sky Arts between them cover the huge range of arts superbly and if BBC4 were to be abolished then it would mean that knowledge and appreciation of arts on television would be restricted not just a smaller section of society but also to a concentrated range of arts. Having a free to air channel that has arts coverage does in my opinion represent PSB obligations of the highest order.
Sky Arts appears to have gone free to air and they want to plonk it on Freeview too by the end of the year. The concern may be that if this move attracts larger audiences for Arts then there may be little incentive to have a channel that effectively competes with it for no apparent reason other than to wheel out archive documentaries.
Mind you that being said, Artsworld (as it was originally) only survived because Sky opened their wallet.
Whilst it's great to hear that Sky Arts is going FTA and may come to Freeview, I would be wary of this leading to any long-term BBC policy on the genres of programming that they provide.
This is simply because Sky's business models and strategies may change in the future, and Sky Arts may be taken back behind the pay-wall at a time that suits Sky (or, indeed, may close entirely at some stage - who knows). It is dangerous for the BBC to withdraw from arts programming just because Sky Arts are currently bulking up their output on FTA.
Should there be good BBC Arts and BBC Music programming shown on BBC Two, then I will gladly shut up about this - I'm not speaking out in favour of keeping BBC Four per se. But, as I expressed yesterday, I have deep concerns that the genre of programming that BBC Four excelled in (yes, once the domain of BBC Two, but sadly not in the recent past) remaining if the channel closes.
If Sky Arts ends up on Freeview in the same sub SD sludge that Sky News is broadcast in, then forget it!