NH
Nick Harvey
Founding member
BBC Four always remove the DOG during, what they class as, serious programmes.
NJ
BBC Four's DOG comes and goes as it pleases. Sometimes it doesn't appear on one run of a programme at 8pm yet appears on the same programme repeated at 3am, and vice-versa. The official policy is to get shot of it during serious programming, which is BBC Four speak for "showing the DOG during programming for non-highbrow folk", apparently.
BBC Three's DOG on the other hand sits on every programme going, passes on the odd film, grows, shrinks, adds new bits (such as "brand new"), becomes more opaque and less opaque on a virtually daily basis and generally shows signs of BBC Three not having a clue whether they want it or not.
Neil Jones
Founding member
plucky duck92 posted:
BBC4's DOG seems to have ran away tonight.
Is this a c*ck up or is there a trial going on?
BBC THREE's mut is in tact so it would be strange if FOUR's has gone walkies.
Is this a c*ck up or is there a trial going on?
BBC THREE's mut is in tact so it would be strange if FOUR's has gone walkies.
BBC Four's DOG comes and goes as it pleases. Sometimes it doesn't appear on one run of a programme at 8pm yet appears on the same programme repeated at 3am, and vice-versa. The official policy is to get shot of it during serious programming, which is BBC Four speak for "showing the DOG during programming for non-highbrow folk", apparently.
BBC Three's DOG on the other hand sits on every programme going, passes on the odd film, grows, shrinks, adds new bits (such as "brand new"), becomes more opaque and less opaque on a virtually daily basis and generally shows signs of BBC Three not having a clue whether they want it or not.
MA
And why did last night's LOG have a laughter track, I'm sure the previous showings haven't ?
plucky duck92 posted:
Thanks for the replies but i forgot to mention this was during Knowing me Knowing you...WAP hardly serious
and the next program was the league of gentlemen another comedy program and it still wasnt there. It was probably a mistake
And why did last night's LOG have a laughter track, I'm sure the previous showings haven't ?
SP
And why did last night's LOG have a laughter track, I'm sure the previous showings haven't ?
Series 1 and 2 both had laughter tracks. The Christmas Special and Series 3 didn't.
Markymark posted:
plucky duck92 posted:
Thanks for the replies but i forgot to mention this was during Knowing me Knowing you...WAP hardly serious
and the next program was the league of gentlemen another comedy program and it still wasnt there. It was probably a mistake
And why did last night's LOG have a laughter track, I'm sure the previous showings haven't ?
Series 1 and 2 both had laughter tracks. The Christmas Special and Series 3 didn't.
RW
Films, drama, plays and music performance all usually qualify for DOG-free status on BBC Four. Comedy programmes, including things like Charlie Brooker and QI, also qualified for quite some time until last year when it seemed to start reappearing. Last week's Alan Partridge did go out with a DOG, so it seems these days they really can't make up their minds...
Robert Williams
Founding member
plucky duck92 posted:
Thanks for the replies but i forgot to mention this was during Knowing me Knowing you...WAP hardly serious
and the next program was the league of gentlemen another comedy program and it still wasnt there. It was probably a mistake
Films, drama, plays and music performance all usually qualify for DOG-free status on BBC Four. Comedy programmes, including things like Charlie Brooker and QI, also qualified for quite some time until last year when it seemed to start reappearing. Last week's Alan Partridge did go out with a DOG, so it seems these days they really can't make up their minds...
JO
Well which one is it going to be? You've contradicted yourself there.
Sorry about that, I changed my mind about what I was going to say, but didn't change it properly.
AJ posted:
Jugalug posted:
I'd say it was deliberately taken off because it was a film-style programme. But I'd say a mistake was more likely.
Well which one is it going to be? You've contradicted yourself there.
Sorry about that, I changed my mind about what I was going to say, but didn't change it properly.