TV Home Forum

BBC Broadcast sold to CBS

(but not that one) (June 2005)

This site closed in March 2021 and is now a read-only archive
AJ
A.J.A.
From Media Guardian

Quote:

BBC sells transmission arm for £166m

Chris Tryhorn, City correspondent
Monday June 27, 2005

The BBC today sold its transmission and branding business BBC Broadcast, raising £166m and taking 1,100 people off the corporation's payroll.
Creative Broadcast Services, a subsidiary of Australian bank Macquarie Group, won out in a four-horse race for the division, which had revenues of £109m last year.

The BBC chief operating officer, John Smith, said Macquarie had put in "a great offer" and would grow and invest in the business, which receives 91% of its revenues from the corporation.

But the deal has angered the broadcasting unions, which argued that BBC Broadcast should be retained as an internal asset.

The assistant general secretary of Bectu, Gerry Morrissey, said he would write to the culture secretary, Tessa Jowell, to protest against the deal.

"We believe selling off assets is not in the long-term interest of the BBC," he said. "When the minister approved the creation of BBC Broadcast, she and the management assured us that it was not a prelude to privatisation, so the staff are despondent that this commitment has been broken so quickly."

The successful completion of the deal is still dependent on the approval of the Department of Culture, Media and Sport.

The BBC said Creative Broadcast Services had given assurances on pensions, terms and conditions for BBC Broadcast's staff.

Mr Morrissey said he welcomed the assurances and said Bectu would work constructively to ensure that the business was successful.

But the deal will test the patience of the unions, who staged a one-day walkout in May over plans to cut more than 4,000 jobs at the corporation.

BBC Broadcast - which provides transmission services such as on-air promotions, subtitling and electronic programme guides - was first earmarked for sale in December under a review of commercial activities by the BBC director general, Mark Thompson.

An initial evaluation process of 18 bids whittled down the field to four: Macquarie, private equity group Apax, French electronics group Thomson/Technicolor, and Exponent Private Equity, a UK buyout firm co-founded by former 3i director Tom Sweet-Escott.

Michael Cook, the chief executive of Macquarie Capital Alliance Group, said: "BBC Broadcast has state-of-the-art facilities and services delivered by very talented people and is in a strong position to take advantage of growing opportunities in Europe as well as developing demand from new communication media.

"The BBC Broadcast management team has extensive experience and strong industry relationships across all aspects of the business."

Peter Phillips, the BBC director of business development and head of the sale team for BBC Broadcast, said the sale represented "excellent value for licence fee payers".

In spite of today's deal, the BBC has put plans to sell other parts of its business on ice.

Outside broadcast division BBC Resources, which has 1,300 employees, will remain part of the corporation until at least June 2007, under concessions laid out earlier this month by Mr Thompson.

The BBC began to scale back its commercial activities last year, with the sale of its IT unit BBC Technology to German engineering giant Siemens in July.

Siemens took on the unit's 1,400 staff and later clinched a £2bn 10-year contract providing technology services to the BBC.

The corporation also closed its commercial subsidiary, BBC Vecta, just a year after it was launched under former director general Greg Dyke to exploit the corporation's software and technology innovations.

Plans to sell commercial arm BBC Worldwide were shelved last year, though parts of the business, such as magazines
IN
intheknow
So much for the British Broadcasting Corporation. What is the use in being called that when you don't even broadcast your own programming now?
NH
Nick Harvey Founding member
I certainly don't like it when things get sold to banks, or subsidiaries thereof.

There'll be too much concentration on counting beans and not enough on quality, mark my words.
SP
Spencer
intheknow posted:
So much for the British Broadcasting Corporation. What is the use in being called that when you don't even broadcast your own programming now?


I was just about to make exactly the same point. Really it's just the British Programme Making Corporation now.

This move also really smacks of short-termism. They'll no doubt benefit initially from the sale of BBC Broadcast, but in the long term, buying in services in most cases costs more than providing them yourselves. It just seems akin to selling off the family silver.
GE
thegeek Founding member
Spencer For Hire posted:
This move also really smacks of short-termism. They'll no doubt benefit initially from the sale of BBC Broadcast, but in the long term, buying in services in most cases costs more than providing them yourselves. It just seems akin to selling off the family silver.
So how long before the same happens to BBC Resources, then?
GS
Gavin Scott Founding member
Spencer For Hire posted:
...buying in services in most cases costs more than providing them yourselves.


What are you basing that on Spencer? I'm neither agreeing or disagreeing with you, but I'd like to know your realm of experience on outsourcing.
MA
marksi
A few years ago the BBC sold many of it's buildings to Land Securities Trillium, then leased the same buildings back from LST, who provided all the ancillary services like cleaning and heating etc.

Recently LST sold some of the same buildings back to the BBC.

The spin put on it was that no one had lost money on the dealings. I find that difficult to believe.
SP
Spencer
Gavin Scott posted:
Spencer For Hire posted:
...buying in services in most cases costs more than providing them yourselves.


What are you basing that on Spencer? I'm neither agreeing or disagreeing with you, but I'd like to know your realm of experience on outsourcing.


Well clearly this is a rather different situation, but the last company I worked for used an external cleaning company to clean the offices. As part of a cost-cutting drive we switched to employing individual cleaners directly which worked out a lot cheaper. Essentially we were only paying the wages of the cleaners, rather than the wages plus the profit margin of the cleaning company. It's just a case of cutting out the middle-man.

In the same way, the BBC will now have to contribute to the profits of Creative Broadcast Services as well as the physical costs of running the operation. I suppose the hope will be that CBS will run a tighter operation and so be able to keep costs down, or most likely a poorer and cheaper service.
LO
lobster
will it still be called 'bbc broadcast' once the deal is completed?
SP
Spencer
Dr Sigmund Mohammad posted:
will it still be called 'bbc broadcast' once the deal is completed?


Almost certainly not, according to my friend who works for them.
SD
Steve D
intheknow posted:
So much for the British Broadcasting Corporation. What is the use in being called that when you don't even broadcast your own programming now?


I take your point, and agree with the sentiment behind it. However, just to redress the balance on behalf of my colleagues upstairs I ought to point out that although they no longer own the transmitters, the BBC do in fact still broadcast all their own radio services!
DA
Dan Founding member
Dr Sigmund Mohammad posted:
will it still be called 'bbc broadcast' once the deal is completed?


No - as it won't be part of the BBC any more, it will not be allowed to use the BBC's name.

Newer posts