MT
Significantly lower. And very very few "family-sized" sets are under $1000 now, which is sort of the magic number.
http://homepage.mac.com/robertpalmer/tvforum/sig.gif
noggin posted:
However the penetration of 16:9 sets is lower in the US I believe?
Significantly lower. And very very few "family-sized" sets are under $1000 now, which is sort of the magic number.
http://homepage.mac.com/robertpalmer/tvforum/sig.gif
FA
I would like to see alternative sides for the boxes instead of leaving BBC ONE alone on the left; for example: BBC ONE: LEFT; BBC TWO: RIGHT; BBC THREE: LEFT; BBC FOUR: RIGHT; CBBC (not box but logo that has appeared on a few trailers) LEFT; CBeebies (moving logo also seen on some trailers) RIGHT; NEWS 24 : LEFT; BBC PARLIAMENT: RIGHT, etc.
The boxes have merly updated the BBC look; instead of going for a whole new package and logo. I wouldnt like to see this logo go as its nice, square and can be adapted easily; unlike its predercessor.
The boxes have merly updated the BBC look; instead of going for a whole new package and logo. I wouldnt like to see this logo go as its nice, square and can be adapted easily; unlike its predercessor.
PE
Significantly lower. And very very few "family-sized" sets are under $1000 now, which is sort of the magic number.
http://homepage.mac.com/robertpalmer/tvforum/sig.gif
and to think we can get a 28" widescreen here for £200.
Are all American widescreen TVs HD though? That would explain the higher price.
Pete
Founding member
MrTomServo posted:
noggin posted:
However the penetration of 16:9 sets is lower in the US I believe?
Significantly lower. And very very few "family-sized" sets are under $1000 now, which is sort of the magic number.
http://homepage.mac.com/robertpalmer/tvforum/sig.gif
and to think we can get a 28" widescreen here for £200.
Are all American widescreen TVs HD though? That would explain the higher price.