JR
I note how since this thread has gone so vastly off topic, the Google ad box has started showing adverts for 'TheNaughtySeat.co.uk'.
MA
Just out of interest, why was this 'Ellie' banned? Trying to think which rule has been broken...or are we into DS territory where people are banned at will.
JR
markstewart posted:
Just out of interest, why was this 'Ellie' banned? Trying to think which rule has been broken...or are we into DS territory where people are banned at will.
Terms and Conditions posted:
If you use multiple logins for the purpose of disrupting the community or annoying other users you will have action taken against your accounts
MA
Ahh point taken. She was annoying though...
jrothwell97 posted:
markstewart posted:
Just out of interest, why was this 'Ellie' banned? Trying to think which rule has been broken...or are we into DS territory where people are banned at will.
Terms and Conditions posted:
If you use multiple logins for the purpose of disrupting the community or annoying other users you will have action taken against your accounts
Ahh point taken. She was annoying though...
RR
Do you wish to know something my dear.
Why are you spending all your time typing on here, when you should be supervising your children you negligent parent.
Oh and by the way, I think you'll find that "The sky at night" was, and still is the longest running TV programme.
And would you like to know something 'dearie'.... she already stated her Daughter is grown up
No, I'm not a dancer. No, my children aren't competitive dancers.
I can't believe the absolute carp I'm reading on this forum! It's just a television show highlighting the brilliant talent of children dancing dances that have been around for absolutely years and years and are still being enjoyed by every generation today both competitively and socially.
It's just dancing not child pornography, murder or grand theft. It's a sporting hobby.
The funniest part of all of this is that you as viewers have a choice. Watch or don't watch. It's not compulsary to watch television at all and by the looks of it here you all moan about every television program going so why not throw your TV's in the bin and strap barbed belts to your inner thighs!
I look forward to your ensuing insults as the regular members here seem to be quite adept at that 
And you don't HAVE to read this forum. Yet here you are, the bitch parade here bitching at us. Isn't there a husband you should be talking at? Or should you all be talking about how badly you were serviced at your local tesco, or how great your son did as 3rd donkey from the left in the school play?
Karen posted:
Ronnie Rowlands posted:
Do you wish to know something my dear.
Why are you spending all your time typing on here, when you should be supervising your children you negligent parent.
Oh and by the way, I think you'll find that "The sky at night" was, and still is the longest running TV programme.
And would you like to know something 'dearie'.... she already stated her Daughter is grown up
No, I'm not a dancer. No, my children aren't competitive dancers.
I can't believe the absolute carp I'm reading on this forum! It's just a television show highlighting the brilliant talent of children dancing dances that have been around for absolutely years and years and are still being enjoyed by every generation today both competitively and socially.
It's just dancing not child pornography, murder or grand theft. It's a sporting hobby.
The funniest part of all of this is that you as viewers have a choice. Watch or don't watch. It's not compulsary to watch television at all and by the looks of it here you all moan about every television program going so why not throw your TV's in the bin and strap barbed belts to your inner thighs!
I look forward to your ensuing insults as the regular members here seem to be quite adept at that
And you don't HAVE to read this forum. Yet here you are, the bitch parade here bitching at us. Isn't there a husband you should be talking at? Or should you all be talking about how badly you were serviced at your local tesco, or how great your son did as 3rd donkey from the left in the school play?
JR
She was already registered under another name and was using multiple profiles to attempt to push her point. This is just making me more and more convinced that you are in fact another one of her sockpuppets.
EDIT: And we only moan about the programmes we deem to be rubbish. We're all entitled to our own tastes.
Karen posted:
Annoying because she had a different point of view to the regular members here or annoying because maybe, just maybe, she was right?
She was already registered under another name and was using multiple profiles to attempt to push her point. This is just making me more and more convinced that you are in fact another one of her sockpuppets.
EDIT: And we only moan about the programmes we deem to be rubbish. We're all entitled to our own tastes.
KA
Ronnie Rowlands, Ahhh, I get it. You're lonely and not getting any - that has to be it http://www.thesoulgirl.com/emote/Aiwan%20Mini/rofl.gif Mind you, for a discriminating post against women it was very weak in sustainable arguement. I think instead of posting on here you should take up one of the evening courses for OAP's and brush up on your literary and language skills http://www.thesoulgirl.com/emote/Laie/risitas6ba0.gif
RR
Living in celibacy at the moment fyi
Good to see you keeping a relevant argument here.
Karen posted:
Ronnie Rowlands, Ahhh, I get it. You're lonely and not getting any - that has to be it http://www.thesoulgirl.com/emote/Aiwan%20Mini/rofl.gif Mind you, for a discriminating post against women it was very weak in sustainable arguement. I think instead of posting on here you should take up one of the evening courses for OAP's and brush up on your literary and language skills http://www.thesoulgirl.com/emote/Laie/risitas6ba0.gif
Living in celibacy at the moment fyi
Good to see you keeping a relevant argument here.
KA
She was already registered under another name and was using multiple profiles to attempt to push her point. This is just making me more and more convinced that you are in fact another one of her sockpuppets.
EDIT: And we only moan about the programmes we deem to be rubbish. We're all entitled to our own tastes.
You can't prove that... people do share IP addresses you know, perhpas it was another member of her household? I run a forum and quite a number of members (that I know personally) and who live close to eachother, share the same IP.
jrothwell97 posted:
Karen posted:
Annoying because she had a different point of view to the regular members here or annoying because maybe, just maybe, she was right?
She was already registered under another name and was using multiple profiles to attempt to push her point. This is just making me more and more convinced that you are in fact another one of her sockpuppets.
EDIT: And we only moan about the programmes we deem to be rubbish. We're all entitled to our own tastes.
You can't prove that... people do share IP addresses you know, perhpas it was another member of her household? I run a forum and quite a number of members (that I know personally) and who live close to eachother, share the same IP.
JR
She was already registered under another name and was using multiple profiles to attempt to push her point. This is just making me more and more convinced that you are in fact another one of her sockpuppets.
EDIT: And we only moan about the programmes we deem to be rubbish. We're all entitled to our own tastes.
You can't prove that... people do share IP addresses you know, perhpas it was another member of her household? I run a forum and quite a number of members (that I know personally) and who live close to eachother, share the same IP.
Yes, but the posting style and modus operandai is remarkably consistent. And people will generally only share an IP if they are using the same ISP on the same tier, live in the same postcode and use the same network hardware.
If anything, the chances of missing are greater than accidentally banning a good member, because people can use proxies to hide their IP address.
Now maul me to death all you like, but I believe I have the moral high ground because I'm not attempting to turn this into an enormous bitch fight to put my point across.
(The fact that I now sound like I'm in CSI: TV Forum worries me.)
Karen posted:
jrothwell97 posted:
Karen posted:
Annoying because she had a different point of view to the regular members here or annoying because maybe, just maybe, she was right?
She was already registered under another name and was using multiple profiles to attempt to push her point. This is just making me more and more convinced that you are in fact another one of her sockpuppets.
EDIT: And we only moan about the programmes we deem to be rubbish. We're all entitled to our own tastes.
You can't prove that... people do share IP addresses you know, perhpas it was another member of her household? I run a forum and quite a number of members (that I know personally) and who live close to eachother, share the same IP.
Yes, but the posting style and modus operandai is remarkably consistent. And people will generally only share an IP if they are using the same ISP on the same tier, live in the same postcode and use the same network hardware.
If anything, the chances of missing are greater than accidentally banning a good member, because people can use proxies to hide their IP address.
Now maul me to death all you like, but I believe I have the moral high ground because I'm not attempting to turn this into an enormous bitch fight to put my point across.
(The fact that I now sound like I'm in CSI: TV Forum worries me.)