TV Home Forum

Ask The BBC Governors...

(July 2005)

This site closed in March 2021 and is now a read-only archive
BO
boring_user_name
Grade's speech:
- BBC Three news unpopular; governors asked BBC management to reassess this.
- Despite criticism, BBC Four will not become more mainstream.
- BBC Radio will continue its public service remit. Governors are particularly confident that radio 1 and 2 are sufficiently different from their rivals to justify licence money.
- iMP development continuing.
- Licence fee payers from outside London want less emphasis on London. BBC must and will develop more local services.

Viewers comments about the BBC:
- 'Impartial'.
- 'Not a wide enough range of films'.
- 'Good value.' 'You pay £12.50 every month for its services; you pay more than that in an evening to get drunk'.
- 'I don't see why you should have to pay for it; you get the other channels for nothing'
- 'A lot of money is going into digital channels, and I can only get analogue'.
- 'The BBC website is the best website on the planet'.

A few questions and answers, and various comments:

Q - Why not fund the BBC using commercials?
A - Because a finite pot of money is available to fund commercials, and if the BBC had to use this money as a source of funding, not only would it have to become more mainstream, but the amount of money available for other broadcasters and the BBC would be lower and as a result they would become impoverished and the quality of British television would suffer.

Michael Grade: 'I did not say that I wanted the BBC to be repeat-free! I would like to see peak-time BBC 1 and 2 peaktime repeat free.'

Mark Thompson: 'I would like to open up the BBC's archive in a different way. I would like the BBC's archive to become available on the internet'.

Mark Thompson also indicated that the move to Manchester might not happen, but that he hoped it would.
PO
Pootle5
boring_user_name posted:
Grade's speech:
- BBC Three news unpopular; governors asked BBC management to reassess this.
- Despite criticism, BBC Four will not become more mainstream.
- BBC Radio will continue its public service remit. Governors are particularly confident that radio 1 and 2 are sufficiently different from their rivals to justify licence money.
- iMP development continuing.
- Licence fee payers from outside London want less emphasis on London. BBC must and will develop more local services.

Viewers comments about the BBC:
- 'Impartial'.
- 'Not a wide enough range of films'.
- 'Good value.' 'You pay £12.50 every month for its services; you pay more than that in an evening to get drunk'.
- 'I don't see why you should have to pay for it; you get the other channels for nothing'
- 'A lot of money is going into digital channels, and I can only get analogue'.
- 'The BBC website is the best website on the planet'.

A few questions and answers, and various comments:

Q - Why not fund the BBC using commercials?
A - Because a finite pot of money is available to fund commercials, and if the BBC had to use this money as a source of funding, not only would it have to become more mainstream, but the amount of money available for other broadcasters and the BBC would be lower and as a result they would become impoverished and the quality of British television would suffer.

Michael Grade: 'I did not say that I wanted the BBC to be repeat-free! I would like to see peak-time BBC 1 and 2 peaktime repeat free.'

Mark Thompson: 'I would like to open up the BBC's archive in a different way. I would like the BBC's archive to become available on the internet'.

Mark Thompson also indicated that the move to Manchester might not happen, but that he hoped it would.


Cheers for the summary, I couldn't get the online streaming to work for some reason. Some interesting points, and good to hear they are still considering providing the archive on the internet.
MO
Moz
It was very good indeed. Michael Grade is a natural TV presenter, which is handy!

They should (and said they would) do this sort of thing more often but actually broadcast it rather than just webcast it. Do a monthly thing like the old Sue Lawley Biteback programme.
DO
dodrade
Moz posted:
Do a monthly thing like the old Sue Lawley Biteback programme.


Biteback was a great idea they should never have axed it. Could you imagine such a programme on ITV?

Newer posts