AN
It’s nothing to do with publicity and everything to do with bringing in some cash to stop them going under.
SP
It's to do with both – the former helping with the latter.
It’s nothing to do with publicity and everything to do with bringing in some cash to stop them going under.
It's to do with both – the former helping with the latter.
GO
It's absolutely everything to do with publicity. It's a textbook Ryanair campaign. They've run a number of ads they've known would be banned and the endless free publicity they get when it is. It's 20 years since the infamous Mannekin Pis campaign in Belgium for example: https://marketinglaw.osborneclarke.com/marketing-techniques/ryanair-continues-rich-belgian-urinal-ad-tradition/
It’s nothing to do with publicity and everything to do with bringing in some cash to stop them going under.
It's absolutely everything to do with publicity. It's a textbook Ryanair campaign. They've run a number of ads they've known would be banned and the endless free publicity they get when it is. It's 20 years since the infamous Mannekin Pis campaign in Belgium for example: https://marketinglaw.osborneclarke.com/marketing-techniques/ryanair-continues-rich-belgian-urinal-ad-tradition/
BR
Considering their latest rumoured appointee to head up OFCOM I doubt it very much.
By the way, is there any serious effort from British politicians to give ASA more power and authority?
Considering their latest rumoured appointee to head up OFCOM I doubt it very much.