TV Home Forum

1989-90 What if?

A look into the Cabinet papers of the time. (February 2017)

This site closed in March 2021 and is now a read-only archive
RO
robertclark125
Mentioning about Thames shows on Channel 4 at weekends in the 1980s, and LWT shows on Channel 4 during weekdays, I raised this topic on another thread, possibly on Facebook.

As I remember at the time, someone said that at weekends, even though Thames wasn't broadcasting, it also wasn't "dark", in that it was still making stuff. It would've also filmed footage for Thames news the next week. In the same way, LWT wasn't "dark" on weekdays, making bits for Weekend World, The London Programme etc.

The 1989 act could have made for an interesting scenario, if it was allowed, so please tell me; Under the new act at the time, ITV and the ITV companies had to commission 25% of their stuff from independent producers. So, let's remember the late 1980s STV drama series "bookie", which was set in a Glasgow bookmakers. Could STV have commissioned that from Border TV, meaning STV was commissioning something but getting another firm to produce it?
HC
Hatton Cross
If Border TV had set up 'Border Television Productions Ltd' a seperate company with different directors and other shareholders significantly different from 'Border Television Holdings PLC' then technically, yes.
Border TV prods could pitch for and win commissions off other ITV companies.

It was the loophole that LWT span off the studios under The London Studios' name and the programme making arm as 'LWTP'.

Downstream of the 1992 franchise battle, if had LWT lost, then they still had two businesses that could still trade. Studios and LWTP could become an indie and still make the programmes.
BL
bluecortina
If Border TV had set up 'Border Television Productions Ltd' a seperate company with different directors and other shareholders significantly different from 'Border Television Holdings PLC' then technically, yes.
Border TV prods could pitch for and win commissions off other ITV companies.

It was the loophole that LWT span off the studios under The London Studios' name and the programme making arm as 'LWTP'.

Downstream of the 1992 franchise battle, if had LWT lost, then they still had two businesses that could still trade. Studios and LWTP could become an indie and still make the programmes.


Lwt 'span off' their studio facilities arm to 'LWT Production Facilities' so that it could be cast adrift if it didn't work out. *

Time showed that the BBC etc were a little reluctant to make programmes at a company called LWT Production Facilities - bit of a loss of face and all that on the end credits etc - so they changed the name to TLS (buying off a London Dance Studio to get hold of the name I believe) - which looked much better.

* and for the first time could work out what was costing what using cost centres.
IS
Inspector Sands

The 1989 act could have made for an interesting scenario, if it was allowed, so please tell me; Under the new act at the time, ITV and the ITV companies had to commission 25% of their stuff from independent producers. So, let's remember the late 1980s STV drama series "bookie", which was set in a Glasgow bookmakers. Could STV have commissioned that from Border TV, meaning STV was commissioning something but getting another firm to produce it?

It wouldn't be classed as an 'indie'. According to legislation passed in 1991 to be classed an 'independent producer you cannot have more than a 25% shareholding in a broadcaster or be owned more than 25% by a broadcaster. This was changed in 2003 to be a UK broadcasterthe full thing here.

So ITV Studios isn't an Indie, but Thames is (though when it was owned by the owners of Channel 5 I would have thought it wasn't). So a subsidiary of Border TV for example wouldn't be.

There's lots of grey areas though as the sector has gone through so many mergers. For example is Shine/Endemol an indie as it's owned by 20th Century Fox? Love productions (makers of Bake Off) definately aren't as they're owned by Sky etc
RI
Riaz
This is true, but it was handy that London Weekday was won by a publisher broadcaster.


Probably strengthened the regions outside of London actually by not having a London franchise who ended up as kind of the default producer of primetime programming in the way LWT kind of was on Saturday nights at least.


Nobody has mentioned whether – after factoring out news and popular networked programmes at prime time – Thames provided a good local service for their region. Some ITV companies were very strongly committed to providing a good local service with a range of quality local programmes but was Thames one of them?

Given the nature of the London weekday region then would it have been better served by a publisher broadcaster rather than a large in-house producer?
WH
Whataday Founding member

Like you, I have no idea what Graham Norton's contractual arrangements are. It could be that he is signed directly to the BBC so a change of the broadcast channel might mean the programme goes without him. A bit of a bizarre concept if you think about it. I don't think morals come into it one bit.


GN's chat show has circumnavigated the main channels over almost the last 20 years, started off on C5 replacing in effect Jack Docharty's show, then to C4, then BBC2, and finally at present on 1. ITV next stop !?


Apart from his BBC show being shown on BBC America, I'm surprised he hasn't been tempted by a direct American deal? Perhaps he prefers to be a big fish in a little pond. We like him and always tune in.


He did take a deal with Comedy Central in between C4 and BBC and he didn't really enjoy the experience.
LL
Larry the Loafer

GN's chat show has circumnavigated the main channels over almost the last 20 years, started off on C5 replacing in effect Jack Docharty's show, then to C4, then BBC2, and finally at present on 1. ITV next stop !?


Apart from his BBC show being shown on BBC America, I'm surprised he hasn't been tempted by a direct American deal? Perhaps he prefers to be a big fish in a little pond. We like him and always tune in.


He did take a deal with Comedy Central in between C4 and BBC and he didn't really enjoy the experience.


Yeah, he hosted The Graham Norton Effect on Comedy Central, which IIRC was also shown on BBC Three over here, and the American reaction was hostile to say the least. For whatever reason, they found his trademark naughty style to be coarse and inappropriate.
WH
Whataday Founding member
They managed to secure Bette Midler for the first show but Comedy Central blocked it as they said she didn't fit in with the show's demographic. Says all you need to know about how things panned out.
BL
bluecortina
Thank you for the additional GN info.
SP
Steve in Pudsey

In the same way, LWT wasn't "dark" on weekdays, making bits for Weekend World, The London Programme etc.


Wasn't LWT also playing out BFBS during the week?
MA
Markymark

In the same way, LWT wasn't "dark" on weekdays, making bits for Weekend World, The London Programme etc.


Wasn't LWT also playing out BFBS during the week?


Mr Cortina will give you chapter and verse on that, they were involved with BFBS playout at one point,
though not using the suite on the South Bank ?

They also provided the 'in programme pres/gfx' for C4 racing
MA
Markymark
And as you point out, ITV had no say in C4's programme scheduling and I think the people at the time would be slightly offended as being referred to as ITV2!


I meant it in a 'good way', back in the 80s, C4 was to ITV what BBC 2 was to BBC 1.

Newer posts