TV Home Forum

The 1980 ITV franchise auction

Any videos? (October 2016)

This site closed in March 2021 and is now a read-only archive
:-(
A former member
ttt posted:
ISTR that Southern's application was a bit presumptuous to say the least (running to only a couple of dozen pages), especially given the competition.

Southern were quite right though to draw attention to TVS's plans for 1500 hours per year of programming. That's four hours per DAY, which would have meant at least 2 hours networked per day surely (some 15% or so of ITV's total network output), something that was never going to happen under the old IBA system. It seems TVS were overreaching from the start, which leads me to conclude that the only surprise was that it took eight years before the inevitable implosion at boardroom level..

You have to remember there wanted it become the BIG 6 and get in on the action which the IBA also liked. TVS did nearly reach that level of output, with all its local programmes etc even in 1982 there had 45mins of local news plus a 15min local filler at 5.30.

ttt posted:
Really TVS's bid should have been turfed out on that ridiculous promise alone. It reminds me of Phil Redmond's bid for the North West franchise a decade later in which he derided Granada's 9 hours per week of local output (a fairly standard figure for the time), and was promising to double this. Was never going to work.


STV managed to have at least 18 hours plus of local programming a week so why cant Granada? Scotland Today that = 3 hours, Local kids programmes = 2 hours, Local religion programme + another hour, then there was scottish woman, scottish books, platform,the home show, Scottish passport the gameshows there had, Local Arts programme N.B, that went like a rocket, of course those late night shows like Funny farm and Late Edition. Of course there was Scotsport and Extra time, there even had 3 times a week local Chat show with Kirsty ( YES that one from the news) and Take the high road., lets not forget Scottish action, that was all back during the 90s.

WE have't even got on to the Scots Gaelic programmes which was other 4 hours a week and the network output like dramas, the wheel of fortunes or even Disney club. That truly was STV golden age.

Last edited by A former member on 25 October 2016 4:22pm
MA
Markymark

The relays are really an echo from 1974, when the IBA reallocated Belmont from Anglia to Belmont.
I think Anglia mounted a campaign, and encouraged the affected viewers to lobby for those relays. Presumably the BBC who had the same problem, chipped in, by equipping them for BBC 1 East too. All three sites were commissioned by the IBA, and not the Beeb. (However the UHF transmitter network build wasa joint 50:50 effort between the two broadcasters, operating as a reciprocal landlord/tenant scheme)


Its good but its not right Wink

Quote:
In addition, the IBA bowed to public pressure from 70,000 viewers around northern parts of Norfolk who were served by Yorkshire Television via the Belmont Transmitter; many of the viewers had gone to "considerable trouble and expense" to receive Anglia Television. Three new low powered relay stations were built, allowing easier access to Anglia transmissions


The public were ignoring the IBA and doing there own thing.


You're splitting hairs I think, so it was the viewers leading the charge (but I'm sure Anglia helped, why wouldn't they have done ?) and the IBA eventually sorted it for the next franchise renewal.

There might have been legislative issues. Sticking relays for Anglia, within in the official (even if it was inappropriate) service area of YTV ?
TT
ttt
You have to remember there wanted it become the BIG 6 and get in on the action which the IBA also liked. TVS did nearly reach that level of output, with all its local programmes etc even in 1982 there had 45mins of local news plus a 15min local filler at 5.30.


Come on, not even Thames were producing four hours a day in total of original programming. Bear in mind this would be four hours, on average, every day of every week not including repeats. It would mean that their studios would be working flat-out, all day every day on productions. It was a ludicrous promise, and TVS never reached anywhere near this figure.

And I lived in Edinburgh for a period in the 1990s. STV were indeed a prolific producer of local programming but there was no way they were regularly producing 18 hours plus of original output per week. 14-15 maybe.

Don't get me wrong -- Granada's nine hours was a bit on the low side, as my local station Tyne Tees was on 11.5 hours/week I believe (reduced by an hour in 1993). But it was hardly a reason to attack their record.
WH
Whataday Founding member
ttt posted:
Southern were quite right though to draw attention to TVS's plans for 1500 hours per year of programming. That's four hours per DAY, which would have meant at least 2 hours networked per day surely (some 15% or so of ITV's total network output), something that was never going to happen under the old IBA system. It seems TVS were overreaching from the start, which leads me to conclude that the only surprise was that it took eight years before the inevitable implosion at boardroom level.


I think they were wrong to call out TVS for that figure - the upcoming launch of Channel 4 was to create greater opportunity for commissions, and the increase in news and general programming for both sub-regions would help add to the tally also.

At its peak TVS ended up producing around 1100 hours a year - perhaps underestimating how difficult it would be breaking their way into the Big 5. Still, over-ambition is perhaps better than none at all. Considering the transformation of the south in the 80s, you have to wonder how Southern would have fit in.
:-(
A former member
ttt posted:
You have to remember there wanted it become the BIG 6 and get in on the action which the IBA also liked. TVS did nearly reach that level of output, with all its local programmes etc even in 1982 there had 45mins of local news plus a 15min local filler at 5.30.


Come on, not even Thames were producing four hours a day in total of original programming. Bear in mind this would be four hours, on average, every day of every week not including repeats. It would mean that their studios would be working flat-out, all day every day on productions. It was a ludicrous promise, and TVS never reached anywhere near this figure.

And I lived in Edinburgh for a period in the 1990s. STV were indeed a prolific producer of local programming but there was no way they were regularly producing 18 hours plus of original output per week. 14-15 maybe.

Don't get me wrong -- Granada's nine hours was a bit on the low side, as my local station Tyne Tees was on 11.5 hours/week I believe (reduced by an hour in 1993). But it was hardly a reason to attack their record.


STV easily would have gotten 4 hours of local programmes per day, there had all those local produce shows, plus Gaelic and network stuff, remember STV moved all the 7pm shows to 17.10 to broadcast local content.

STV during the 90s had lunchtime Scotland today so that was 1hour straight of the bat, there had local programme, that was another 1-2 hours, STV opt out of plenty of ITV peak time slots. at the weekends with its local sport, kids, Gaelic and Religions shows it would get you 6 hours per day.
Last edited by A former member on 25 October 2016 4:54pm
TT
ttt
Do you have some STV schedules for this period?
IS
Inspector Sands
JAS84 posted:

It's also interesting that a bidder for South West is called West Country, since that's the name of that region's winner of the 1991 franchise round. Not the same company, I assume?

No, remember that they aren't really companies that bid for ITV franchises/licenses but consortia put together especially for the bid. So it's almost certainly just a co-incidental name (there's only a limited number of geographic names to go round I suppose)


The Westcountry that won in 1991 was part owned by South West Water, which didn't get privatised until the late 80's
NT
Night Thoughts


The Westcountry that won in 1991 was part owned by South West Water, which didn't get privatised until the late 80's


How long did South West Water stay involved with Westcountry for?
WH
Whataday Founding member
JAS84 posted:

It's also interesting that a bidder for South West is called West Country, since that's the name of that region's winner of the 1991 franchise round. Not the same company, I assume?

No, remember that they aren't really companies that bid for ITV franchises/licenses but consortia put together especially for the bid. So it's almost certainly just a co-incidental name (there's only a limited number of geographic names to go round I suppose)


The Westcountry that won in 1991 was part owned by South West Water, which didn't get privatised until the late 80's


Although that BBC South programme posted earlier references a previous contender taking part in 1980.
MK
Mr Kite
Southern were seen as a bit too comfortable. With Southern covering the large and relatively affluent area, I think it was felt they didn't quite punch there weight. It was always a bit "damned if you do, damned if you don't" as TVS certainly had ambition and an intention to not only be a big player but to shake up the whole system. Despite some success, it was largely frustrated and the thing that ultimately undone them a decade later.

On a different note: I feel that article is a bit harsh dismissing Mersey Vision as "no serious competition". They were as serious as many of the other bidders around the country and did have Granada worried to some extent. Seems like the writer had a cob on voer them not being available for comment.

Also, Cambridge the regional capital of East Anglia?
RO
robertclark125
There was some concern raised by local politicians, but not by the ITC, in the involvement of South west water in Westcountry. In the late 1980s there was a water poisoning outbreak at Camelford, and SWW were criticised in a report following an inquiry, and also local news reports were showing SWW in a bad light. Some folk were concerned that SWW's involvement could have led to reporting of SWW being in a more favourable light.

Going back to the 1980 franchise round, one key difference between that and the 1991 battle, was that back in 1980, all staff had to be kept on, as was the trade union rules at the time. So, in a sense, it was simply a change of management for the staff. The 1991 franchise round was different, in that trade union rules in the 1980 round no longer applied. An example was the south and south east franchise; TVS employed circa 800 people. The winner, Meridian, planned to employ circa 370 people, so there were going to be some job losses.

It must be mentioned that Meridian was going to be a "publisher broadcaster", in that it was getting all its programmes that it commissioned made by external production companies. Ironically, one of these was Topical Television, who, I believe, were founded by some TVS staff. Quite what the extent of the actual job losses was, is unclear as a result of TVS losing to Meridian.
MA
Markymark

On a different note: I feel that article is a bit harsh dismissing Mersey Vision as "no serious competition". They were as serious as many of the other bidders around the country and did have Granada worried to some extent.


Indeed, and didn't the company end up producing Brookside, and then Hollyoaks for C4 ?

Newer posts