The Newsroom

"The West Tonight" and "Westcountry Live" to return?

(September 2009)

This site closed in March 2021 and is now a read-only archive
SC
scott5
The BBC Bristol website says "They said last February's merger of two ITV regional broadcast regions - which created one area from the Scilly Isles to Gloucestershire - would be reversed."

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/bristol/8271002.stm
IS
Inspector Sands
and the name of the consortium that's planning it.... Television SouthWest:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2009/sep/23/itv-regional-news-consultation-reponses
GL
Glenn
I certainly oppose ITN's idea. Their idea is so against what ITV is (or was) about. Of course ITV is a patchwork that's what the regions are there for: to provide for the individual regions. Rolling Eyes
NI
Nicky
Glenn posted:
I certainly oppose ITN's idea. Their idea is so against what ITV is (or was) about. Of course ITV is a patchwork that's what the regions are there for: to provide for the individual regions. Rolling Eyes


ITN wants a single contract for England, not one bulletin covering the whole of England (as some have misinterpreted it).
IS
Inspector Sands

ITN wants a single contract for England, not one bulletin covering the whole of England (as some have misinterpreted it).

Indeed, although that's kinda what exists at the moment and I don't think that's really the idea, Ofcom seem keen on plurality (which is a good thing).
SP
Spencer
It's going to be interesting if the plans for the independent regional news consortia go ahead. It'd be nice to think we could see a return to the days of each region having its own news programme with its own identity, set and titles.
IS
Inspector Sands
It's going to be interesting if the plans for the independent regional news consortia go ahead. It'd be nice to think we could see a return to the days of each region having its own news programme with its own identity, set and titles.


I do wonder how it will work, especially as it's initially just a pilot.

Will the independent just take over the existing production facilities, rent them from ITV and take on ITV staff on TUPE? The only alternative is for the new providers to start from scratch and ITV close down what's left of their facilities... but then what happens if the pilot isn't continued?

Also there's archive and the like, the ITV newsrooms have access to (in some cases) 50 years of archive and stock footage, would an indie news provider have access to that?
DV
DVB Cornwall
Posted this is the South west England thread a few days ago ....

Quote:

A reasonable applicant it would seem, but I'd much prefer a micro franchising route, for a lengthy period (five years minimum), rather than an appointment under a trial basis which would be so difficult to 'undo' if and when the permanance of this form of Channel 3 Local News became the norm. Northcliffe or anyone else for that matter won't tool up properly for the service if it was only for a short term trial, the results would show this and public perception of the new replacement services would be poor.
LO
Londoner
It's going to be interesting if the plans for the independent regional news consortia go ahead. It'd be nice to think we could see a return to the days of each region having its own news programme with its own identity, set and titles.


I was at an Ofcom event on Tuesday and Michael Jermey (ITV news/regions boss) was saying that ITV will still want to impose some kind of consistency of branding across the regions even if/when third parties are providing the content.

This didn't go down particularly well with some of the prospective bidders for the pilot services who were alongside him on the panel at the conference.
DV
DVB Cornwall
What part of the rules don't ITV understand, if they are abdicating from their responsibilities, albeit consensenually so, you cannot impose conditions on your successors.
IS
Inspector Sands
What part of the rules don't ITV understand, if they are abdicating from their responsibilities, albeit consensenually so, you cannot impose conditions on your successors.


I don't see why not, if you're producing a programme for a channel (your customer) then why shouldn't that channel be able oto have a say over the programme?

Look at ITN's productions for ITV and Channel 4 for example
LO
Londoner
The difference, though, is in that case it is ITV or C4 who are paying the bill.

Under the proposed arrangemnts ITV will just provide the airtime (valuable though that is).

Newer posts