PE
what do places have to do with weather? Places come under Travel and Tourism and not Geography, Geography is the science of the earth.
In Scotland this year the very first thing on our course was atmospheric and oceanic circulation and how it runs the weather. In Standard Grade we learned how to predict weather from isobars and the sheets consisted of isonbars and you had to draw the weather on them, in symbols, not blobs.
Clearly your education was either not up to standard or was sucked out with your colonic.
New Labour if ever I heard it. What is the obsession with moving forward? There is nothing wrong with the old system so why change it? Whilst this is a pres forum so graphics = good these graphics have just made the weather harder to understand. It is not an advancement and no advancement was needed in the first place apart from maybe a software upgrade from the meterologists's end to make their job easier.
Pete
Founding member
jay posted:
Have you seen a Geography syllabus lately? It's all about farming and volcanoes these days! We don't actually learn about
places!
And just for the record, it isn't just me in the whole country that doesn't understand what they mean - so don't be so patronising.
And just for the record, it isn't just me in the whole country that doesn't understand what they mean - so don't be so patronising.
what do places have to do with weather? Places come under Travel and Tourism and not Geography, Geography is the science of the earth.
In Scotland this year the very first thing on our course was atmospheric and oceanic circulation and how it runs the weather. In Standard Grade we learned how to predict weather from isobars and the sheets consisted of isonbars and you had to draw the weather on them, in symbols, not blobs.
Clearly your education was either not up to standard or was sucked out with your colonic.
I T V 1 posted:
You know that I think the license fee should be scrapped, however because we "have" to pay, then people have the right to complain. I like the new graphics so far, but the clouds and other things are hard to understand. I knew the BBC would get a bashing for these new graphics, because the British people aint used to them, but we do have to move forward and not live in the past. Ive tried to make my commenta as fair as possible, but if they are I dont know!
New Labour if ever I heard it. What is the obsession with moving forward? There is nothing wrong with the old system so why change it? Whilst this is a pres forum so graphics = good these graphics have just made the weather harder to understand. It is not an advancement and no advancement was needed in the first place apart from maybe a software upgrade from the meterologists's end to make their job easier.